From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Maxim Kim Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#65049: Minor update to the repro steps Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 23:12:40 +1000 Message-ID: <87edjvp6ev.fsf@gmail.com> References: <83y1iruky1.fsf@gnu.org> <83il9qom6k.fsf@gnu.org> <86v8dandhq.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83bkf1woy3.fsf@gnu.org> <835y57tf23.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="40455"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: 65049@debbugs.gnu.org, juri@linkov.net To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 22 15:13:22 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qYRC8-000A7u-85 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 22 Aug 2023 15:13:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qYRBs-0006q2-B4; Tue, 22 Aug 2023 09:13:00 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qYRBr-0006ps-J7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Aug 2023 09:12:59 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qYRBr-0007dp-Al for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Aug 2023 09:12:59 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qYRBt-0006sM-Uz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Aug 2023 09:13:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Maxim Kim Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 13:13:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 65049 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 65049-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B65049.169270997726419 (code B ref 65049); Tue, 22 Aug 2023 13:13:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 65049) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Aug 2023 13:12:57 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58743 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qYRBo-0006s2-R8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 22 Aug 2023 09:12:57 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pl1-x633.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::633]:57387) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qYRBm-0006rp-Vn for 65049@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 22 Aug 2023 09:12:55 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pl1-x633.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-1bee82fad0fso27995405ad.2 for <65049@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 22 Aug 2023 06:12:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1692709966; x=1693314766; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=JaupVQExQy8vTnoR4EmO3wRQ8VM39I9zL08T+qz6Le0=; b=KEobKN7nM8El1NO7rLs9ulHwDle8AaLS1j51ZEK7hYTNiuuz4e+OuCuIXI8e1SmOnO claWLW7lkmsoPMgV2hA7ne9m8XeT7O/i2XWP1fv4/qy8CbPLCiZAA9ylnAWhSGbPV6IF tzQHDgfkKy6P+AEoouBaSmQJUeKqd1T3uGqhUUvKNmo2fnHJryMf+cpXMRSdQr5cDt3Y tGfD2YOX8kFiM/LW4pEZ1I03sDQvjYTvl026amWFjtXUtk0vLjNPjsEmMUWb1RMwsW4/ d7fR6u44ccrEbityWfPARBB5NN/heLWvEBpN4n3P4AEeRgwcJbMWnQqPRQRnTgrQ2QJF nGVg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1692709966; x=1693314766; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=JaupVQExQy8vTnoR4EmO3wRQ8VM39I9zL08T+qz6Le0=; b=OYi2P7kjnng5RxDVF+DS/8TdsUTnxHHl7IhuvxoomdqHlAjbEqpG217VoIce29eMEv 9boxGz6OoiWImxuCOOi4/Iwvh0J/cyXgJW/1jnGxMOY90mZMfBCHRepy4/SpHcIjpA+U 1gN4/qdj2pPR5riW42D2QrXrgpmCiSyxvDagvGBaLUzDub5jDAp+dg+4vZEtvJ5R5Hxg xKTGZMQsaCNsi/5+dDFak6RviyXqhjBB/9IhdyJgTW6CJkLI/7s77eOTgy7g5TVXJKwv IZnroCmGlaTboa8e/PhC4vpv55iTI8Kx6T4I5o67vfG1JJviNmQlggduOxuNDn7QQPl9 wIJA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwqpyH8DPbqMavIYWf+qecDp+TGbhxZd9TQ7Tr8Bp2EFlI3bhW6 2MucC8Q1iT98qbEJDl4rSyHtXkp/Nik= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IG0k9pe3kEOXlpl0lzAxZZP6XJ+aRytVNmGTPabQFsrYm3J5oaL0vB8g7UgbKkrfGQEbcyszQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:9898:b0:1b9:ebf4:5d2 with SMTP id s24-20020a170902989800b001b9ebf405d2mr6666349plp.33.1692709965617; Tue, 22 Aug 2023 06:12:45 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from haba-debian ([2406:3400:30f:a460:acaf:722a:3d06:179a]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c4-20020a170902c1c400b001bf8779e051sm4295188plc.289.2023.08.22.06.12.43 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 22 Aug 2023 06:12:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <835y57tf23.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 22 Aug 2023 15:52:20 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:268170 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > I'm sorry, but it doesn't fail here, even without installing the patch > with -unix encoding. > > I don't know what to say. Maybe it is something with Git for Windows: > my version is quite old (2.10.0); perhaps something has changed since > then? Also are you sure you tried with Emacs 29? I used the latest > emacs-29 branch from Git and stock Emacs 29.1, and they both work as > expected. I use the latest build available from https://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/emacs/windows/emacs-29/emacs-29.1_2-installer.exe I don't remember exact git version (will check when I am at my windows laptop) but it is more recent than 2.10.0. I will downgrade it to see if this will help. > If none of the above helps, perhaps describe the steps above in more > detail. For example, the following details I had to guess: > > . was the new file with Unix EOL or Windows CRLF EOL format? new file had UNIX EOL > . what was buffer-file-coding-system of the new file? 'utf-8-unix > . what was the exact text of summary in log message you typed each > time in the recipe? test > . what did the "new line" in the file say, exactly? world > Maybe one of these details is significant? Actually all my files I create in emacs should be with LF endings: (set-language-environment 'utf-8) (setq-default buffer-file-coding-system 'utf-8-unix) I will double-check if the generated patch file has LF endings tomorrow.