From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tomas Hlavaty Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: (declare (type (function... Date: Tue, 07 May 2024 19:38:49 +0200 Message-ID: <87edad8qty.fsf@neko.mail-host-address-is-not-set> References: <87h6f98sus.fsf@neko.mail-host-address-is-not-set> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="27375"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Marco Antoniotti Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue May 07 19:39:46 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1s4On4-0006uN-DN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 07 May 2024 19:39:46 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s4OmJ-0002SH-OA; Tue, 07 May 2024 13:38:59 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s4OmE-0002Rk-9z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 07 May 2024 13:38:56 -0400 Original-Received: from logand.com ([37.48.87.44]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s4OmC-0002HD-K7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 07 May 2024 13:38:53 -0400 Original-Received: by logand.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id F2D0C19E897; Tue, 7 May 2024 19:38:50 +0200 (CEST) X-Mailer: emacs 28.2 (via feedmail 11-beta-1 I) In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=37.48.87.44; envelope-from=tom@logand.com; helo=logand.com X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:318965 Archived-At: On Tue 07 May 2024 at 19:10, Marco Antoniotti wrote: > pardon me, but > > grep type.... > > would yield many more hits yes, it is always possible to find even worse name to grep > , and I do not understand why this is relevant to the issue. don't you search source code? I just pointed out that your suggested name could be even better. > The points are two: I understand that and agree with you. I just sent to you links to the discussion.