From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Philip Kaludercic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: having emacs-matlab in ELPA, finally. FSF paper signed Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2024 21:34:38 +0000 Message-ID: <87ed30tixd.fsf@posteo.net> References: <871q37um8q.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <87v80cp8nx.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <877ccmkmwy.fsf@posteo.net> <87bk1y0wcm.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <87o75xkjpj.fsf@posteo.net> <874j3z8cy5.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <87ldxansy5.fsf@posteo.net> <87y11a13vx.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <87mshotnbx.fsf@posteo.net> <87a5doz7u3.fsf@mat.ucm.es> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="27044"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Stefan Kangas , Andrea Corallo , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Uwe Brauer Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 24 22:35:50 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1tFKGj-0006rR-1q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 24 Nov 2024 22:35:49 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tFKFp-0006Iv-VX; Sun, 24 Nov 2024 16:34:54 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tFKFi-0006Ii-Jh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Nov 2024 16:34:46 -0500 Original-Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tFKFg-0000N0-3N for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Nov 2024 16:34:46 -0500 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 714C4240101 for ; Sun, 24 Nov 2024 22:34:40 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1732484081; bh=LcVFwua2AFLJs877NF0taRWqnOSJviNci/5DWoJjHH8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Autocrypt:OpenPGP:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version: Content-Type:From; b=Q278DU1ldEI+QHC11tBx+QWjuZYXnitxgALO6PcALTUuShFD3KoC+ay0UwXxVSXwu 6dhPtKdkS62tVHNhdcuUAQONA19lahzvZOHk/FOvwOwXD8jdkhHJjEAbJIs4lHalA6 qifdOjgtGt5j6937SaU/DYvLKT9ACs0CTfAkM/j42+R50VuT5EIuU1iGyRAW+ay9uE aiNVBLiV+v415G7Ei0OSEaq2t4YVdy3IVOhIhXKsmMOHt6IZIUHn2nynevPj9ChmdE fqSFVt7ldRCivdtS7Kbk9cIyv5tBu4fZ3y8vKM5kQGS4eqEJN0EtkXzbzoKDQ1OzQw l+nbC59vYt+Bg== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4XxMYX0LtDz6tm8; Sun, 24 Nov 2024 22:34:39 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <87a5doz7u3.fsf@mat.ucm.es> (Uwe Brauer's message of "Sun, 24 Nov 2024 21:37:40 +0100") Autocrypt: addr=philipk@posteo.net; keydata= mDMEZBBQQhYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdAHJuofBrfqFh12uQu0Yi7mrl525F28eTmwUDflFNmdui0QlBo aWxpcCBLYWx1ZGVyY2ljIChnZW5lcmF0ZWQgYnkgYXV0b2NyeXB0LmVsKSA8cGhpbGlwa0Bwb3N0 ZW8ubmV0PoiWBBMWCAA+FiEEDg7HY17ghYlni8XN8xYDWXahwukFAmQQUEICGwMFCQHhM4AFCwkI BwIGFQoJCAsCBBYCAwECHgECF4AACgkQ8xYDWXahwulikAEA77hloUiSrXgFkUVJhlKBpLCHUjA0 mWZ9j9w5d08+jVwBAK6c4iGP7j+/PhbkxaEKa4V3MzIl7zJkcNNjHCXmvFcEuDgEZBBQQhIKKwYB BAGXVQEFAQEHQI5NLiLRjZy3OfSt1dhCmFyn+fN/QKELUYQetiaoe+MMAwEIB4h+BBgWCAAmFiEE Dg7HY17ghYlni8XN8xYDWXahwukFAmQQUEICGwwFCQHhM4AACgkQ8xYDWXahwukm+wEA8cml4JpK NeAu65rg+auKrPOP6TP/4YWRCTIvuYDm0joBALw98AMz7/qMHvSCeU/hw9PL6u6R2EScxtpKnWof z4oM OpenPGP: id=philipk@posteo.net; url="https://keys.openpgp.org/vks/v1/by-email/philipk@posteo.net"; preference=signencrypt Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.66; envelope-from=philipk@posteo.net; helo=mout02.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:325677 Archived-At: Uwe Brauer writes: >> Stefan Kangas writes: > >> We should keep in mind that this will break if the package is not >> installed using package.el, as then > >> (cadr (assq 'matlab-mode package-alist)) ;=> nil > >> and thus > >> (package-desc-version nil) ;!> (wrong-type-argument package-desc nil) > > >> 1+ to this. The custom commands for version numbers are an anti-pattern IMO. > > Ok I leave it to you two to sort this out, I do whatever the consensus is. I vote for no custom version command. > >> Uwe Brauer via Matlab-emacs-discuss >> >> writes: > > >> That might very well be, I used a local checkout that ELPA made when >> experimenting with the package, and it appears that was not the newest >> version. > > >> What is the name of the MELPA package? If it is called "matlab", then >> by default ELPA will consult the "matlab.el" file for version >> information. Otherwise it will consult "matlab-mode.el". We can adjust >> this though if need be in the package specification. > > It is called now matlab-mode! OK. So do you want to track the version number in matlab.el or matlab-mode.el? >> It doesn't go through the logs, it just searches for a copyright string >> somewhere in the header. > But in header just in matlab-mode.el or in all files? > I repeat the question I asked Stefan > > Ok, last nitpicking question, right now the header reads > > > ;; Copyright (C) 1997-2024 Eric M. Ludlam > ;; Copyright (C) 1991-1997 Matthew R. Wette > > All authors/contributers signed the FSF paper, the last one in January > 2024, > > So should I replace that by > > ;; Copyright (C) 1991-2024 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > > And delete the other authors? or shall I just use the year 2024? because it was > the year the last remaining contributor signed? IANAL, but I think that should work. > Uwe