* Emacs for powerpc64
@ 2005-04-23 12:32 Jérôme Marant
2005-04-23 14:52 ` Denis Bueno
2005-04-23 16:03 ` Andreas Schwab
0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Jérôme Marant @ 2005-04-23 12:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: schwab
Hi,
Does Emacs CVS works on powerpc64 (G5 processors)?
Few weeks ago, I forwarded a patch adding powerpc64 support
for Emacs 21.4 and I'd like to know whether the problem has
been worked on already in the upcoming 22.1.
Andreas, is SuSE already working on the powerpc64 port?
Thanks.
Cheers,
--
Jérôme Marant
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Emacs for powerpc64
2005-04-23 12:32 Emacs for powerpc64 Jérôme Marant
@ 2005-04-23 14:52 ` Denis Bueno
2005-04-23 14:55 ` Jérôme Marant
2005-04-23 16:03 ` Andreas Schwab
1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Denis Bueno @ 2005-04-23 14:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: emacs-devel
On 4/23/05, Jérôme Marant <jerome.marant [at] free.fr> wrote:
> Does Emacs CVS works on powerpc64 (G5 processors)?
I've had my G5 (Dual 2.5) for many months, and Emacs has worked on it
for as log as I can remember. Every time I update CVS, I run:
./configure --without-x --enable-carbon-app && make bootstrap
-Denis
PGP: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=0xA1B51B4B&op=index
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Emacs for powerpc64
2005-04-23 14:52 ` Denis Bueno
@ 2005-04-23 14:55 ` Jérôme Marant
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Jérôme Marant @ 2005-04-23 14:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: emacs-devel
Denis Bueno <dbueno@gmail.com> writes:
> On 4/23/05, Jérôme Marant <jerome.marant [at] free.fr> wrote:
>> Does Emacs CVS works on powerpc64 (G5 processors)?
>
> I've had my G5 (Dual 2.5) for many months, and Emacs has worked on it
> for as log as I can remember. Every time I update CVS, I run:
>
> ./configure --without-x --enable-carbon-app && make bootstrap
Err, sorry I should have mentioned GNU/Linux systems. This is what I am
interested in.
Cheers,
--
Jérôme Marant
http://marant.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Emacs for powerpc64
2005-04-23 12:32 Emacs for powerpc64 Jérôme Marant
2005-04-23 14:52 ` Denis Bueno
@ 2005-04-23 16:03 ` Andreas Schwab
2005-04-23 16:58 ` Jérôme Marant
2005-04-23 17:37 ` Jérôme Marant
1 sibling, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Schwab @ 2005-04-23 16:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: emacs-devel
Jérôme Marant <jerome.marant@free.fr> writes:
> Does Emacs CVS works on powerpc64 (G5 processors)?
There were only a few configuration bits missing. Current CVS is working
now.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Emacs for powerpc64
2005-04-23 16:03 ` Andreas Schwab
@ 2005-04-23 16:58 ` Jérôme Marant
2005-04-23 17:37 ` Jérôme Marant
1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Jérôme Marant @ 2005-04-23 16:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de> writes:
> Jérôme Marant <jerome.marant@free.fr> writes:
>
>> Does Emacs CVS works on powerpc64 (G5 processors)?
>
> There were only a few configuration bits missing. Current CVS is working
> now.
Great. Thanks!
--
Jérôme Marant
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Emacs for powerpc64
2005-04-23 16:03 ` Andreas Schwab
2005-04-23 16:58 ` Jérôme Marant
@ 2005-04-23 17:37 ` Jérôme Marant
2005-04-24 4:28 ` Ken Raeburn
1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Jérôme Marant @ 2005-04-23 17:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: emacs-devel
Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de> writes:
> Jérôme Marant <jerome.marant@free.fr> writes:
>
>> Does Emacs CVS works on powerpc64 (G5 processors)?
>
> There were only a few configuration bits missing. Current CVS is working
> now.
Hmm, one question though: why isn't it necessary to redefine constants
like BITS_PER_LONG, BITS_PER_EMACS_INT, EMACS_INT and so on, as done in
the (for instance) AMD64 port file?
Thanks.
--
Jérôme Marant
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Emacs for powerpc64
2005-04-23 17:37 ` Jérôme Marant
@ 2005-04-24 4:28 ` Ken Raeburn
2005-04-24 12:12 ` Jérôme Marant
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Ken Raeburn @ 2005-04-24 4:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: Andreas Schwab, emacs-devel
On Apr 23, 2005, at 13:37, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Hmm, one question though: why isn't it necessary to redefine constants
> like BITS_PER_LONG, BITS_PER_EMACS_INT, EMACS_INT and so on, as done in
> the (for instance) AMD64 port file?
I don't think it's actually needed in the AMD64 port either. The way
these get defined should work properly on any 64-bit system that
defines _LP64.
Somewhere I've got a source tree (from before I got hosed with work and
stopped being able to contribute) where one of my few pending patches
was the deletion of some of these symbols from the AMD support, like I
did for the Alpha in, oh, wow, was it back in 2002? But I didn't get
to test out or check in the AMD changes... Maybe soon, now that I've
got access to an AMD x86_64 system, and some amount of spare time, I
can fix that, and contribute a little more as well.
Ken
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Emacs for powerpc64
2005-04-24 4:28 ` Ken Raeburn
@ 2005-04-24 12:12 ` Jérôme Marant
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Jérôme Marant @ 2005-04-24 12:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: Andreas Schwab, emacs-devel
Ken Raeburn <raeburn@raeburn.org> writes:
> On Apr 23, 2005, at 13:37, Jérôme Marant wrote:
>> Hmm, one question though: why isn't it necessary to redefine constants
>> like BITS_PER_LONG, BITS_PER_EMACS_INT, EMACS_INT and so on, as done in
>> the (for instance) AMD64 port file?
>
> I don't think it's actually needed in the AMD64 port either. The way
> these get defined should work properly on any 64-bit system that
> defines _LP64.
Ah, OK.
> Somewhere I've got a source tree (from before I got hosed with work
> and stopped being able to contribute) where one of my few pending
> patches was the deletion of some of these symbols from the AMD
> support, like I did for the Alpha in, oh, wow, was it back in 2002?
> But I didn't get to test out or check in the AMD changes... Maybe
> soon, now that I've got access to an AMD x86_64 system, and some
> amount of spare time, I can fix that, and contribute a little more as
> well.
Thanks.
--
Jérôme Marant
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-04-24 12:12 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-04-23 12:32 Emacs for powerpc64 Jérôme Marant
2005-04-23 14:52 ` Denis Bueno
2005-04-23 14:55 ` Jérôme Marant
2005-04-23 16:03 ` Andreas Schwab
2005-04-23 16:58 ` Jérôme Marant
2005-04-23 17:37 ` Jérôme Marant
2005-04-24 4:28 ` Ken Raeburn
2005-04-24 12:12 ` Jérôme Marant
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.