From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Getting the click position in a string Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 12:16:00 -0400 Message-ID: <87d5f1k77c.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> References: <85fyk2ugle.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <85fyk0rbrk.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <853bg0r1ms.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <85y7xspkgk.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <87ejzk8mmv.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <85r73jkyqf.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <87r73j6mav.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <858xpqkgvy.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <87irou4t8q.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <854q0eitpo.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1146241028 25123 80.91.229.2 (28 Apr 2006 16:17:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 16:17:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "Kim F. Storm" , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 28 18:17:05 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FZVe6-0004kk-0E for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Apr 2006 18:16:42 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FZVe5-00067U-Dt for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Apr 2006 12:16:41 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FZVdY-0005qc-QK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Apr 2006 12:16:08 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FZVdV-0005nR-9k for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Apr 2006 12:16:08 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FZVdV-0005nD-0v for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Apr 2006 12:16:05 -0400 Original-Received: from [209.226.175.93] (helo=tomts36-srv.bellnexxia.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FZVgc-0002BF-SU; Fri, 28 Apr 2006 12:19:19 -0400 Original-Received: from alfajor ([70.55.140.75]) by tomts36-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.13 201-253-122-130-113-20050324) with ESMTP id <20060428161601.HEX13653.tomts36-srv.bellnexxia.net@alfajor>; Fri, 28 Apr 2006 12:16:01 -0400 Original-Received: by alfajor (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 97414D741F; Fri, 28 Apr 2006 12:16:00 -0400 (EDT) Original-To: David Kastrup In-Reply-To: <854q0eitpo.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (David Kastrup's message of "Thu, 27 Apr 2006 23:39:31 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:53562 Archived-At: > Well, XEmacs has opaque keymaps and/or events, I believe. For Emacs, > both keymaps as well as events can be cons cells, so I am not sure > eventp and keymapp will always be able to tell them apart. How's that relevant? key-binding would not need to distinguish keymaps from events, but keys from events. Stefan