Re: How are Windows users supposed to print the PostScript refcards?

From: michael@cadilhac.name (Michaël Cadilhac)
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: How are Windows users supposed to print the PostScript refcards?
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 12:56:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87d4xrg0sz.fsf@lrde.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <jwvodhcyzp5.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (Stefan Monnier's message of "Sun, 12 Aug 2007 21:48:09 -0400")

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 961 bytes --]

Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:

>> I'd go for a patch like the following :
>
> I'd much rather we use pdftex than ps2pdf so as not to go
> through PostScript.

Well, it means that we have to modify each .tex file to use proper
\pdfpagewidth and \pdfpageheight (surrounded by tests for « Are we
outputing it PDF »), or use the package geometry for the few LaTeX
files.  It's another task, for sure.

I'd give it a try if the final decision is to remove the .ps files.

I was proposing the previous patch because I'd prefer keep them.

Are we waiting for the poll to end or for a decision from RMS ?

-- 
 |   Michaël `Micha' Cadilhac       |  21 seems like a good value: half of   |
 |   http://michael.cadilhac.name   |  of 42 and just old enough to drink!   |
 |   JID/MSN:                       |   Why would you want to change it?     |
 `----  michael.cadilhac@gmail.com  |          -- Stefan Monnier        -  --'

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 188 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 142 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Emacs-devel mailing list
Emacs-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel