From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Daiki Ueno Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Suggestion: epa-file-select-keys should show currently selected keys Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 17:39:44 +0900 Message-ID: <87d4qiaj3j.fsf@broken.deisui.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1204101606 1813 80.91.229.12 (27 Feb 2008 08:40:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 08:40:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Sascha Wilde , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 27 09:40:31 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JUHq2-000491-GW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 09:40:30 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JUHpW-0002aO-Ev for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 03:39:58 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JUHpS-0002aJ-6x for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 03:39:54 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JUHpP-0002ZT-WB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 03:39:53 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JUHpP-0002ZD-Ni for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 03:39:51 -0500 Original-Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JUHpO-0008D7-MV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 03:39:50 -0500 Original-Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com ([209.85.200.175]) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JUHpN-00025c-KA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 03:39:49 -0500 Original-Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 29so2209064wff.24 for ; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 00:39:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type:sender; bh=rsuOmE50mdmdkjFkePkDoYZuUsfFWw+3OPZ+TBD/YC0=; b=tAq+3o9bD7fIdM+z+kpn6J7JPgPDtnAVkyG2T1ytS/YKJOWNnEzgz/oElKoaf+GYq9GdZdg0C9LDkz0OcJWnSuFUC1bNVnWN1UPl3wYg7vnzTtWdujfn07Kpvu8rSZtwVe5+oX2tk99pY2OXyyKDbPJS2UhuQFBaoZhVf+Yar+s= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type:sender; b=hFOXKOoyHWM6Gpzi2x3d2zwGt4FYFKBTDZO5i/G9Mevj5BFO/lA//8cJFxn1AvDdUeszU9tZM3MmqpENTAY8Nxy1M+lvrikFLX1XtwfC2vwh9bXiCf+lWPukoQBhXIhig24nXIBleeIijAp2+VD/LIhuoEe712eAhxYBDHvxqWs= Original-Received: by 10.143.8.10 with SMTP id l10mr4907841wfi.181.1204101586933; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 00:39:46 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from p360 ( [150.82.173.253]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 32sm14041691wfa.13.2008.02.27.00.39.45 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 27 Feb 2008 00:39:46 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Mon, 25 Feb 2008 14:01:38 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by mx20.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:90579 Archived-At: >>>>> In >>>>> Richard Stallman wrote: > It would be a good idea to check mailcrypt and make sure that oga > provides fully equivalent functionality. Also that it works > with all the various packages, including Rmail and Gnus. I'll look at mailcrypt. For Rmail, I would like someone familiar with Rmail to check. The key bindings in mail-mode are described in "(epa) Mail-mode integration". Gnus has used EasyPG as its default PGP backend since the initial merge. I would also like to know if there is really no problem about it. Regards, -- Daiki Ueno