From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bug#736: C-l interacts badly with scroll-conservatively Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 23:47:51 -0400 Message-ID: <87d4k77zmg.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: <873al3u0ao.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <00da01c90083$58563410$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> <87tzdj8ni3.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1219031286 22864 80.91.229.12 (18 Aug 2008 03:48:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 03:48:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 736-done@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 18 05:48:59 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KUvjl-0002Vh-Rd for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 18 Aug 2008 05:48:58 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39265 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KUvio-0002kw-T3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 17 Aug 2008 23:47:58 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KUvik-0002kh-He for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Aug 2008 23:47:54 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KUvii-0002kV-4q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Aug 2008 23:47:53 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=60467 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KUvih-0002kS-Ux for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Aug 2008 23:47:51 -0400 Original-Received: from c-24-63-201-57.hsd1.ma.comcast.net ([24.63.201.57]:33534 helo=furry) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KUvih-0007hc-P4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Aug 2008 23:47:51 -0400 Original-Received: by furry (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4FF64C058; Sun, 17 Aug 2008 23:47:51 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87tzdj8ni3.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> (Chong Yidong's message of "Sun, 17 Aug 2008 15:12:04 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:102572 Archived-At: Chong Yidong writes: > But why does recenter-top-bottom use scroll-conservatively? AFAICT, > people often use a large nonzero number for scroll-conservatively so > that when point is at the bottom of the window, C-n scrolls down by one > and keeps the cursor at the bottom; and similarly, if point is at the > top of the window, C-p keeps the cursor at the top. It doesn't make > sense to make scroll-conservatively affect C-l. > > I think we should use scroll-margin for this purpose, rather than > scroll-conservatively. I've changed C-l to use scroll-margin instead of scroll-conservatively.