From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: leak in make-network-process Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 21:14:22 -0500 Message-ID: <87d4fa8l4x.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> References: <200812221802.mBMI28aU001131@mothra.ics.uci.edu> <200812291910.mBTJAEUT027466@mothra.ics.uci.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1230603279 5653 80.91.229.12 (30 Dec 2008 02:14:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 02:14:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dan Nicolaescu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 30 03:15:45 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LHU91-0006i8-Dh for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 30 Dec 2008 03:15:43 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56810 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LHU7n-0002I0-EY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 29 Dec 2008 21:14:27 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LHU7j-0002Hl-6w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Dec 2008 21:14:23 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LHU7i-0002HZ-Bk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Dec 2008 21:14:22 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=39238 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LHU7i-0002HW-64 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Dec 2008 21:14:22 -0500 Original-Received: from cyd.mit.edu ([18.115.2.24]:39277) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LHU7i-0007y2-2O for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Dec 2008 21:14:22 -0500 Original-Received: by cyd.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1B5DB57E206; Mon, 29 Dec 2008 21:14:22 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <200812291910.mBTJAEUT027466@mothra.ics.uci.edu> (Dan Nicolaescu's message of "Mon, 29 Dec 2008 11:10:14 -0800 (PST)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:107405 Archived-At: Dan Nicolaescu writes: > Actually only this is needed: > > { > struct Lisp_Process *p = XPROCESS (proc); > /* Set all Lisp_Object members of struct Lisp_Process to nil. */ > p->childp = Qnil; > p->status = Qnil; > } > > Why can't GC get these fields? Should something like this be checked > in? Maybe something else in Lisp is still referring to that dead process object.