From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Karl Fogel Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Moving to bzr? Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2009 10:41:58 -0500 Message-ID: <87d4f3yt6h.fsf@canonical.com> References: Reply-To: Karl Fogel NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1231083734 26311 80.91.229.12 (4 Jan 2009 15:42:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 15:42:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs Devel To: dhruva Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 04 16:43:24 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LJV8N-0003iH-8X for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 04 Jan 2009 16:43:23 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46455 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LJV77-0005zP-VW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 04 Jan 2009 10:42:05 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LJV73-0005z7-DL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Jan 2009 10:42:01 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LJV72-0005yv-Pb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Jan 2009 10:42:01 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=34817 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LJV72-0005ys-NN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Jan 2009 10:42:00 -0500 Original-Received: from adelie.canonical.com ([91.189.90.139]:44214) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LJV72-0007Vh-CA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Jan 2009 10:42:00 -0500 Original-Received: from hutte.canonical.com ([91.189.90.181]) by adelie.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69 #1 (Debian)) id 1LJV71-0001fW-2C; Sun, 04 Jan 2009 15:41:59 +0000 Original-Received: from cpe-72-229-5-126.nyc.res.rr.com ([72.229.5.126] helo=floss) by hutte.canonical.com with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LJV70-0002Ya-V8; Sun, 04 Jan 2009 15:41:59 +0000 In-Reply-To: (dhruva's message of "Sun, 4 Jan 2009 18:12:00 +0530") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:107571 Archived-At: dhruva writes: > Not trying to start a flame thread, however I would like to update > some findings. > I am updating bzr from their development branch and hence have the > latest and greatest. When I run a 'bzr pull' on Emacs repo daily, it > is running for >15 mins versus less than 3 mins for git. This is a > serious usability issue. If more constructive feedback is required, I > could profile it send the output over time and see if things are > improving or status quo. I'd like to know the details, and try to reproduce. What are the exact repository addresses you're pulling from? Are you getting approximately the same number of revisions in each pull? Thanks, -Karl