From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bzr repository ready? Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 13:38:02 +0900 Message-ID: <87d43c332t.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> References: <87zl6vskq0.fsf@red-bean.com> <874op07kb0.fsf@red-bean.com> <87639fr3w7.fsf@red-bean.com> <87vdhfpil2.fsf@red-bean.com> <87einvxy9c.fsf@red-bean.com> <20091118230952.GB908@muc.de> <87my2jw05z.fsf@red-bean.com> <83skc9pbf7.fsf@gnu.org> <87iqd5vw5n.fsf@red-bean.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1258777921 1002 80.91.229.12 (21 Nov 2009 04:32:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 04:32:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , jearl@notengoamigos.org, ian.clatworthy@canonical.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Karl Fogel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 21 05:31:53 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NBhdY-00088r-HL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 21 Nov 2009 05:31:52 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51904 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NBhdY-0003kY-0E for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 20 Nov 2009 23:31:52 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NBhdQ-0003js-9p for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Nov 2009 23:31:44 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NBhdL-0003fq-Bo for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Nov 2009 23:31:43 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=56042 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NBhdL-0003fb-7E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Nov 2009 23:31:39 -0500 Original-Received: from mtps01.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp ([130.158.97.223]:49324) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NBhdH-0003Kx-6Z; Fri, 20 Nov 2009 23:31:35 -0500 Original-Received: from uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp [130.158.99.156]) by mtps01.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54EF31537B6; Sat, 21 Nov 2009 13:31:33 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: by uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CD88E1A25EE; Sat, 21 Nov 2009 13:38:02 +0900 (JST) In-Reply-To: <87iqd5vw5n.fsf@red-bean.com> X-Mailer: VM 8.0.12-devo-585 under 21.5 (beta29) "garbanzo" d20e0a45a4b2 XEmacs Lucid (x86_64-unknown-linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:117403 Archived-At: Karl Fogel writes: > My sympathies -- I came to bzr from the centralized-vc world too. It's > actually not that hard though. You just have to separate the concept of > "checkpoint my work" from the concept of "publish my work". In > centralized vc, these are unified in the "commit" command. In Bazaar, > "commit" means "checkpoint" and "push" means "publish" (roughly speaking). Darcs has the best terminology: "record" (instead of "checkpoint" which has unnecessary connotations), and just "push" for "push" (since centralized VCSes invariably use "commit" for record + push).