From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs-23 release branch Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 18:32:31 +0200 Organization: JURTA Message-ID: <87d3z9369c.fsf@mail.jurta.org> References: <87zl2g24xy.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87mxyfq3bz.fsf@gmx.de> <87sk87h49a.fsf@gmx.de> <87ljdzaq2m.fsf@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1268412380 26543 80.91.229.12 (12 Mar 2010 16:46:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 16:46:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Chong Yidong , Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Michael Albinus Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 12 17:46:15 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nq806-0006LE-Ut for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:46:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40845 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nq806-0001eR-Hc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 11:46:14 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Nq7wI-0008Ge-Ck for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 11:42:18 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=44779 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nq7wF-00081E-FE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 11:42:17 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nq7r6-0001mh-Jn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 11:36:58 -0500 Original-Received: from smtp-out1.starman.ee ([85.253.0.3]:36392 helo=mx1.starman.ee) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nq7r6-0001mO-DR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 11:36:56 -0500 X-Virus-Scanned: by Amavisd-New at mx1.starman.ee Original-Received: from mail.starman.ee (82.131.92.98.cable.starman.ee [82.131.92.98]) by mx1.starman.ee (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B4263F40D2; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 18:36:48 +0200 (EET) In-Reply-To: <87ljdzaq2m.fsf@gmx.de> (Michael Albinus's message of "Thu, 11 Mar 2010 15:30:25 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:121868 Archived-At: >> Having dbus in "net" makes just as little sense to me, so I guess >> that'd be OK ;-) >> But we should maybe think of a better directory structure. > > D'accord. D-Bus is designed for inter process communication, like > Corba. Maybe we could introduce a subdirectory "lisp/ipc". De facto all files in the "lisp/net" subdirectory currently belong to the "comm" keyword category. This keyword has the description: "communications, networking, remote access to files". I think it makes no sense to create a new subdirectory like "comm" because in this case we'll have endless discussions whether a file belongs to the "communications" category and should go to the "comm" subdirectory or it belongs to the "networking" category and should go to the "net" subdirectory. One option is to rename "net" to "comm", so the keyword will match the subdirectory name, but I'm not sure what practical benefits this would provide. Until it is renamed, we could accept the fact that the keyword "comm" corresponds to the subdirectory name "net", and put all files that fit the description "communications, networking, remote access to files" to the "net" subdirectory. -- Juri Linkov http://www.jurta.org/emacs/