From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Eric Schulte" Subject: Re: Re: Worg needs some reorganizing Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 09:26:43 -0700 Message-ID: <87d3nufa7a.fsf@gmail.com> References: <4CAD81B0.6090807@manor-farm.org> <87ocayl81d.fsf@manor-farm.org> <0E084C6C-6FD1-4C74-BD9F-34F2830B93C5@gmail.com> <87bp6ytacd.fsf_-_@stats.ox.ac.uk> <87fwsubckf.fsf@gnu.org> <87aaj2w5x4.fsf@fastmail.fm> <87d3nyuhkw.fsf@altern.org> <87aaj0kggo.fsf@gmail.com> <87zkr0load.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87pqrwipjd.fsf@gmail.com> <87oc7glhef.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87hbd8ins8.fsf@gmail.com> <87ipxolgji.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87aaj0iiff.fsf@gmail.com> <87r5cbk28p.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87fwsrtokh.fsf@gnu.org> <87lj2jouz7.fsf@fastmail.fm> <877he2fvw0.fsf@gnu.org> <87fwsqw8u3.fsf@fastmail.fm> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=47042 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PfEQ5-0003F6-9k for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 11:28:38 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PfEPp-00042a-CL for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 11:28:25 -0500 Received: from mail-pw0-f41.google.com ([209.85.160.41]:40971) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PfEPp-00042P-3t for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 11:28:17 -0500 Received: by pwj8 with SMTP id 8so1450267pwj.0 for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 08:28:16 -0800 (PST) List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Matt Lundin Cc: Dan Davison , Ian Barton , Jeff Horn , Bastien , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Carsten Dominik , Jason Dunsmore Matt Lundin writes: > Bastien writes: > >> Jeff Horn writes: >> >>> Jason seems to be garnering a lot of votes, but Eric's zenburn >>> emulation makes my eyes happy. If Jason wins out, I suppose I could >>> always just read Worg in emacs... :D >> >> Or use Eric zenburn-like css by selecting it as an alternative >> stylesheet in Firefox : View -> Page Style -> [select stylesheet]. >> >> I don't know how to make this choice persistent from Firefox and I >> don't know if this feature is available for other browsers, but it >> is certainly worth having several stylesheet available. > > Could we perhaps go ahead and put the new stylesheets on Worg along with > alternate stylesheet links in the publishing preamble? That way we could > begin to tweak the stylesheets as a community and test them "on the > fly." (It would also save Jason the work of having to publish to tmp > directories.) Others would then be free to add their own > stylesheets---though I suppose that adding alternate stylesheet links > will require access to the publishing options on the server. > > Once we've decided on a default, we could then adjust the preamble > accordingly and clean up the alternates. > This sounds like a great approach to me. I'm convinced that there are other Org-mode users with much more sophisticated knowledge of CSS who may improve our initial efforts in time. One other alternative that comes to mind--while we're making impositions on Jason's kindness :)--is that it would be nice to have an alternate version of Worg published side-by-side with the original, only instead of publishing each page using org-publish-as-html, it could publish each page using only htmlize. That way we could show off how nice Org-mode syntax can be when viewed from inside of Emacs, and users could see a side-by-side between the plain-text and html versions. An example of this approach done successfully is Dan's Babel example at http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~davison/software/org-babel/drift.org.html Cheers -- Eric