From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Windows' "split status" Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 19:01:39 +0200 Organization: JURTA Message-ID: <87d3csdot8.fsf@mail.jurta.org> References: <87vcqqoekt.fsf@gnu.org> <4EBD6B63.4050607@gmx.at> <87vcqq6utg.fsf@gnu.org> <4EBE4414.10009@gmx.at> <87d3cwr9hc.fsf@gnu.org> <4EBFA0AF.7000608@gmx.at> <87obwgatpy.fsf@gnu.org> <4EBFFBA5.1000309@gmx.at> <87hb26gdx8.fsf@gnu.org> <4EC213EA.4080304@gmx.at> <871ut9n2rr.fsf@gnu.org> <4EC2820E.7010401@gmx.at> <87y5vhs04e.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <87obwc7ixv.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1321463072 30819 80.91.229.12 (16 Nov 2011 17:04:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 17:04:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: martin rudalics , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Chong Yidong Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 16 18:04:27 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RQiuR-0006MQ-77 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 18:04:27 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51101 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RQiuN-0001S6-I6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 12:04:23 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:55179) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RQiuH-0001Pj-VD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 12:04:21 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RQiu9-0007dO-JI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 12:04:17 -0500 Original-Received: from smarty.dreamhost.com ([208.113.175.8]:40730) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RQiu0-0007Xq-3O; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 12:04:00 -0500 Original-Received: from ps18281.dreamhostps.com (ps18281.dreamhost.com [69.163.218.105]) by smarty.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B48D6E804D; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 09:03:58 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from localhost (ps18281.dreamhostps.com [69.163.218.105]) by ps18281.dreamhostps.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 858E5451C5C3; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 09:03:58 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87obwc7ixv.fsf@gnu.org> (Chong Yidong's message of "Wed, 16 Nov 2011 13:08:44 +0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.91 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 208.113.175.8 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:146060 Archived-At: > Good idea, but I think `window-combination-limit' fits existing Emacs > terminology better. We could let a value of `t' have the binary window > tree behavior for now, and defer numerical values for post-release. Also I think `window-splits' is a bad name too. It's vague and provides no hint of its purpose. Would it be possible to find a better name that mentions `combination'? Such as e.g. `window-combination-resize' or `window-combination-balance'?