From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: please review bug #13141 Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 11:52:18 +0900 Message-ID: <87d2wz5jtp.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> References: <415AF94149E240B7BCB28128E45D3135@us.oracle.com> <20130119232015.GA517@acm.acm> <20130120105003.GA3091@acm.acm> <20130120200226.e67f106a5103898511e901dd@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1358736752 17189 80.91.229.3 (21 Jan 2013 02:52:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 02:52:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 21 03:52:51 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Tx7V7-0000H6-Ql for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 03:52:45 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34647 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tx7Uq-0007MY-Tt for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 20 Jan 2013 21:52:28 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:57554) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tx7Uo-0007Kx-BY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Jan 2013 21:52:27 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tx7Uk-0000ww-KU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Jan 2013 21:52:26 -0500 Original-Received: from mgmt2.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp ([130.158.97.224]:45093) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tx7Uk-0000wQ-A5; Sun, 20 Jan 2013 21:52:22 -0500 Original-Received: from uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp [130.158.99.156]) by mgmt2.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33C9A9708D7; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 11:52:19 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: by uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EDA4D1A3537; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 11:52:18 +0900 (JST) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: VM undefined under 21.5 (beta32) "habanero" b0d40183ac79 XEmacs Lucid (x86_64-unknown-linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 130.158.97.224 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:156526 Archived-At: Glenn Morris writes: > If any of you corresponding on this want something useful to do, there > are hundreds (literally) of more important bugs currently open. > > If you prefer to keep chatting, could you please at least confine it to > one mailing list? It's OK if you're annoyed, but please step down the sarcasm. It has a perverse effect, since we disagree with your opinion of what's useful. A suggestion: you could add a feature to debbugs such that if any of a list of mailing list addresses appears among the addressees, a message is sent to the author asking for confirmation that they want to spam both lists. This would require users to do something positive to actually send mail to a bug, and might even teach some of them to delete bug addresses before sending. Alternatively, you could teach your MUA to refuse to display duplicates.