From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Eshell and Sudo Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:01:36 +0100 Message-ID: <87d2vxsou7.fsf@gmx.de> References: <87ehgg451n.fsf@gnu.org> <87txpc3wnn.fsf@gmx.de> <87wqu6u91q.fsf@gmx.de> <8738wulqvd.fsf@dimension8.tehua.net> <87fw0uu4c6.fsf@gmx.de> <8738wur054.fsf@dimension8.tehua.net> <87ppzyxl94.fsf@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1361196121 24923 80.91.229.3 (18 Feb 2013 14:02:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 14:02:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Aidan Gauland , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 18 15:02:20 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U7RIS-0001jp-43 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:02:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33092 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U7RI7-0003T8-VE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 09:01:59 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:57562) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U7RHy-0003QS-0a for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 09:01:58 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U7RHp-0007g4-Tm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 09:01:49 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]:58306) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U7RHp-0007fB-LJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 09:01:41 -0500 Original-Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([10.1.76.34]) by mrigmx.server.lan (mrigmx002) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MevCx-1UVyQP0ii1-00OZzf for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:01:40 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 18 Feb 2013 14:01:39 -0000 Original-Received: from p57BB97C2.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO arthur.gmx.de) [87.187.151.194] by mail.gmx.net (mp034) with SMTP; 18 Feb 2013 15:01:39 +0100 X-Authenticated: #3708877 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19L5+pkPk9LJ5iHDvd3+hPUg+2XWfUxd2XdBrrixu aDtg5V/iQCPtAn In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Mon, 18 Feb 2013 08:48:49 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4.x-2.6.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.15.19 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:157125 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: > They don't look "obviously safe" to me, so it'd only be OK on emacs-24 > if it's a regression. IOW: "how old is this problem"? Regression wrt Emacs 24.2. I've started "emacs -Q" of GNU Emacs 24.2.1 (i686-redhat-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.6.4) of 2013-02-02 on buildvm-19.phx2.fedoraproject.org No problem there. > Stefan Best regards, Michael.