From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jambunathan K Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#15312: Info (point-entered, point-left): Doc incomplete, hence incorrect Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 15:58:18 +0530 Message-ID: <87d2odqam5.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87ppsiw22k.fsf@gmail.com> <83sixej6iz.fsf@gnu.org> <878uz573kr.fsf@gmail.com> <83fvtck8mv.fsf@gnu.org> <87hadrel77.fsf@gmail.com> <83zjrjiifl.fsf@gnu.org> <877gel1ejy.fsf@gmail.com> <87vc25z1pe.fsf@gmail.com> <837geli1yn.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1379068040 11691 80.91.229.3 (13 Sep 2013 10:27:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 10:27:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 15312@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 13 12:27:22 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VKQaw-0001aW-9z for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 12:27:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45863 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VKQav-0006nx-Id for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 06:27:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53848) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VKQaj-0006bV-I1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 06:27:15 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VKQad-0003ML-GR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 06:27:09 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:52624) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VKQad-0003MH-Ch for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 06:27:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VKQac-000210-4d for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 06:27:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Jambunathan K Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 10:27:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 15312 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 15312-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B15312.13790679737682 (code B ref 15312); Fri, 13 Sep 2013 10:27:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 15312) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Sep 2013 10:26:13 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60916 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VKQZo-0001zo-FZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 06:26:13 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pb0-f52.google.com ([209.85.160.52]:40080) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VKQZk-0001zZ-KG for 15312@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 06:26:09 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pb0-f52.google.com with SMTP id wz12so1048507pbc.25 for <15312@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 03:26:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=OolaLVy+gRg8YEHr/yuCOpNzqA3mTB65XdoTEX2XKjE=; b=C+SwE5m56anFzJcwwJPnvrbGg7Gx4ktBOJsfyGba+PimbjG/ZwMCeiVgA76sDIALTw 98oZcjKUKmva8OBphfenfKDyoDX31hYCCTHGYeyZ7AWyroVj0WFkKt+rRF57C1gIvtdt Gp2C/a9XmG4HJeHow2pFffqoBU8LGSgUP4r7SmQVbK0E5PuaWJ17I447kHonHw7V1NKq yB961cb70aB7EMqiqT5CySb0K4qrberN+q75pEeYhqRUEyofUq+fTeYKjFd4AlQDWs3R JB+oBDwk/b6IOfsdf0pgTC7qTPXcs2icK+geYYeoTpQTR+E8+j1AXBzYKXIXGK29i8UC 6BLQ== X-Received: by 10.66.240.67 with SMTP id vy3mr14202734pac.141.1379067962600; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 03:26:02 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from porunai ([115.242.244.30]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id qp10sm17071563pab.13.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1.1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 13 Sep 2013 03:26:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <837geli1yn.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 13 Sep 2013 11:02:24 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:78331 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > To make my point clear: it makes very little sense to me to invoke the > motion hooks depending on whether some other text properties changed > as well. Motion hooks should have no relation whatsoever to any other > text property, such as face or whatever. We are talking about the same thing. > So, to me, the code definitely has some bug, the question is which one > and how to fix it. It is not easy to know how to fix it, because the > documentation is ambiguous and can be interpreted in more than one way > (of which you picked up one). We should agree on the interpretation > before we decide how to fix the code and the doc.