From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joseph Vidal-Rosset Subject: Texlive packages in Gnus via Org Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2014 11:04:17 +0100 Message-ID: <87d2k1lbdq.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=-=-=" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58856) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W1CTV-00058c-0p for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Jan 2014 05:04:30 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W1CTT-000614-39 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Jan 2014 05:04:28 -0500 Received: from mail-we0-x22f.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c03::22f]:53693) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W1CTS-00060L-TS for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Jan 2014 05:04:27 -0500 Received: by mail-we0-f175.google.com with SMTP id w62so2556915wes.34 for ; Thu, 09 Jan 2014 02:04:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from crunchbang ([2a01:e35:2f7f:ac80:221:70ff:fe1c:6528]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id j3sm6858434wiy.3.2014.01.09.02.04.25 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 09 Jan 2014 02:04:25 -0800 (PST) List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: "Liste-emacs-orgmode@gnu.org " --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain #+OPTIONS: latex:t Hello Nick, Bastien, Eric, Uwe, and the list, I know that I am obstinate, but I am obstinate about this topic because I feel that what I would be happy to get is not impossible. Unfortunately, I am an amateur, bad in programming languages and I am unable to reach by myself this goal. Now I am finally able to write a formula in a Gnus article, like this simple one for example $ p \to p $ . But I need more. If I write #+begin{equation} A \vdash_{m} \neg \neg A #+end{equation} I am not sure that it will work. It would be already very nice. I know that the latex code #+BEGIN_SRC \begin{equation} A \vdash_{m} \neg \neg A \end{equation} #+END_SRC will not work, neither for example if I try to use another texlive package like bussproofs. I wonder how it is possible to get png images in Gnus for everything that is created by latex, as it is possible already to get it for html via org export. It could be very nice for the scientific community to get such a tool thanks to Gnus + Org. Best wishes, Jo. --=-=-= Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="==-=-=" --==-=-= Content-Type: text/html

Hello Nick, Bastien, Eric, Uwe, and the list,

I know that I am obstinate, but I am obstinate about this topic because
I feel that what I would be happy to get is not
impossible. Unfortunately, I am an amateur, bad in programming languages
and I am unable to reach by myself this goal.

Now I am finally able to write a formula in a Gnus article, like this
simple one for example $ p → p $ .

But I need more. If I write

#+begin{equation}
A m ¬ ¬ A
#+end{equation}

I am not sure that it will work. It would be already very nice.

I know that the latex code

\begin{equation}
A \vdash_{m} \neg \neg A
\end{equation}

will not work, neither for example if I try to use another texlive
package like bussproofs.

I wonder how it is possible to get png images in Gnus for everything
that is created by latex, as it is possible already to get it for html
via org export.

It could be very nice for the scientific community to get such a tool
thanks to Gnus + Org.

Best wishes,

Jo.

--==-=-=-- --=-=-=--