From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#15994: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2014 21:52:12 -0800 Message-ID: <87d2iv7bw3.fsf@building.gnus.org> References: <015bf53e-c4c7-4344-a8a4-193dbb7113bc@default> <874n47ehfw.fsf@building.gnus.org> <5d2ade64-d6be-4e4f-906e-a8fede8117cb@default> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1392011653 11380 80.91.229.3 (10 Feb 2014 05:54:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 05:54:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 15994@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 10 06:54:21 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WCjox-0005Kx-E7 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 06:54:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53541 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WCjow-0007un-Vt for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 00:54:18 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33067) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WCjoo-0007u8-PG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 00:54:15 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WCjoh-0000SY-E6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 00:54:10 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:47873) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WCjoh-0000SU-BA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 00:54:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WCjoh-0003BK-75 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 00:54:03 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 05:54:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 15994 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 15994-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B15994.139201162212181 (code B ref 15994); Mon, 10 Feb 2014 05:54:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 15994) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Feb 2014 05:53:42 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33655 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WCjoL-0003AP-G5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 00:53:41 -0500 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:34211) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WCjoJ-0003AF-U1 for 15994@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 00:53:40 -0500 Original-Received: from [204.14.154.233] (helo=building.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WCjo5-00076f-Ek; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 06:53:25 +0100 In-Reply-To: <5d2ade64-d6be-4e4f-906e-a8fede8117cb@default> (Drew Adams's message of "Sun, 9 Feb 2014 21:23:56 -0800 (PST)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13001 (Ma Gnus v0.10) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-MailScanner-ID: 1WCjo5-00076f-Ek MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1392616405.94107@je/oZisk6Q+cGTeORzA71w X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:85214 Archived-At: Drew Adams writes: >> Are you still getting this backtrace? > > I really don't know whether recent crashes that I've had are > related to this one or not. That is my reply to the same question > about other crash backtraces also. As far as I am concerned, you > can close such bugs, but those who know more about the backtraces > and crashes might feel differently. The last message (before mine) was Eli asking you for more information... -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/