From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Heerdegen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#17871: 24.4.50; (elisp) `Core Advising Primitives': interactive spec as function? Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 22:48:36 +0200 Message-ID: <87d2dqdsyj.fsf@web.de> References: <400906ac-35f1-48e4-8df9-8e65b340209b@default> <87vbrjdajs.fsf@web.de> <82178260-247b-4653-85db-d6586480419e@default> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1404161365 25694 80.91.229.3 (30 Jun 2014 20:49:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 20:49:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 17871@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 30 22:49:17 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1X1iVp-0008P4-3A for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 22:49:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36563 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X1iVo-00070M-PV for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 16:49:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55523) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X1iVg-0006zN-D5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 16:49:13 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X1iVa-0001r6-P6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 16:49:08 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:47111) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X1iVa-0001qy-La for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 16:49:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1X1iVa-00030b-1n for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 16:49:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Heerdegen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 20:49:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 17871 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 17871-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B17871.140416132911543 (code B ref 17871); Mon, 30 Jun 2014 20:49:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 17871) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Jun 2014 20:48:49 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38261 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1X1iVM-000306-KR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 16:48:48 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.14]:50951) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1X1iVI-0002zr-SG for 17871@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 16:48:46 -0400 Original-Received: from drachen.dragon ([94.217.127.201]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M7blv-1Wgtxy0rzz-00xK4b; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 22:48:37 +0200 In-Reply-To: <82178260-247b-4653-85db-d6586480419e@default> (Drew Adams's message of "Sun, 29 Jun 2014 08:52:29 -0700 (PDT)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.92 (gnu/linux) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:EC8erMhXoRGE+5VBU7qK6OAhhz3H2psu0DEnYQE+d9p1MaLyS3e uRpt9jVIB/QPX/BJVVAwpXKjqd+snz/tJS8pcaQlNO/AWej415RKJ083iZT0fUgsFRslPV1 izFL2MoLPzPuBnlO82IzsXn8VFgrBKAkBF3VS3kCNyL+yRrPm0R5oB4N3UDQRwS8t8rKPH2 wo7+NZX+wIOVYLc6/9QvQ== X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:91017 Archived-At: Drew Adams writes: > And yes, that updated doc about interactive specs should then > cross-reference the doc about using a functional interactive spec for > advising - and vice versa. Dunno if that would be good. Although we can with nadvice use the same syntax for defining pieces of advice as for defining functions, advices have a different meaning (semantic). The interactive specs of advices are not exactly interactive specs in the common sense - although they look similar, they are related, but different features. I think a short example would be good. Also, the term "function" is a bit unclear here, maybe we should add "a lambda expression or fbound symbol" or so, to make clear that we don't mean a sexp that returns a function. Michael.