From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: reverse in Emacs 24.4 Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 10:43:57 +0900 Message-ID: <87d25foqea.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> References: <87r3txhhdj.fsf@petton.fr> <87oap0h8mm.fsf@petton.fr> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1423705476 16101 80.91.229.3 (12 Feb 2015 01:44:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 01:44:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Nicolas Petton , emacs-devel To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 12 02:44:20 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YLipH-0002VZ-Q7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 02:44:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47763 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YLipH-0006tW-2m for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 20:44:19 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49824) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YLip5-0006sM-8H for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 20:44:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YLip0-0003dg-A9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 20:44:07 -0500 Original-Received: from shako.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp ([130.158.97.161]:34775) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YLioz-0003bq-PQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 20:44:02 -0500 Original-Received: from uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp [130.158.99.156]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shako.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 341691C3871; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 10:43:58 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: by uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0B3241A26E3; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 10:43:58 +0900 (JST) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: VM undefined under 21.5 (beta34) "kale" acf1c26e3019 XEmacs Lucid (x86_64-unknown-linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 130.158.97.161 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:182934 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: > > I see. So you'd rather test the feature instead of check the version of > > Emacs? > > Yes, It's more reliable (it works with branches that may have the patch but not an updated emacs-version), and Emacs Lisp is implemented by other projects that don't follow Emacs versioning.