From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Alexis Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#20074: edebug tracing can't be stopped with 'S' Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2015 01:02:25 +1100 Message-ID: <87d24d9ery.fsf@gmail.com> References: <83wq2n4i4f.fsf@gnu.org> <87fv999p2q.fsf@gmail.com> <83r3st2m1p.fsf@gnu.org> <87egot9lhz.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1426256479 12882 80.91.229.3 (13 Mar 2015 14:21:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 14:21:19 +0000 (UTC) To: 20074@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 13 15:21:10 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YWQSb-0005GK-BK for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 15:21:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37167 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YWQSa-0007At-OO for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 10:21:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55721) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YWQQQ-0003XH-3q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 10:18:57 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YWQB4-000346-8t for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 10:03:10 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:46710) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YWQB4-000342-5k for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 10:03:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YWQB3-00065W-Pc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 10:03:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Alexis Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 14:03:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20074 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 20074-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B20074.142625535923372 (code B ref 20074); Fri, 13 Mar 2015 14:03:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 20074) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Mar 2015 14:02:39 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45278 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YWQAh-00064t-DC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 10:02:39 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pd0-f177.google.com ([209.85.192.177]:35402) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YWQAe-00064e-R0 for 20074@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 10:02:37 -0400 Original-Received: by pdbfp1 with SMTP id fp1so29153571pdb.2 for <20074@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 07:02:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=references:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type; bh=F/5+b1PVxUVWz18g2np73op2njssCLRZMQSE45ajxCA=; b=O8EnyEuex5aSFjUrXPxXd2KpYsKY3zL+I/J2PAgYgXjaW7X3z+DUKbFPr8kgZwNCof 5zHA9j7SsEkkSIfViw0mEZjZT3I+n+50zzHZufjtSMltc/h1cXlQeeEnWo28roNrKyk1 2PBmzOmO0y49x1T9AGt61N99xeHz2GSRTeYYF0leVD8SM9B1uljo+K84NJYDOLHqBhLc lZYlfX1wnDOy+bHEYqEuDjJKwpFXJocmf7S4xVfFeHM7F09Py9SsdA5Y1e2nnLHCFZqf XIO4GvUGRcvARF5j+o8zN25DHkCPk+LRh1MWkSUfkZg0hBuVxNCCj9Bc1vrmS3cN5r6i neYg== X-Received: by 10.70.134.102 with SMTP id pj6mr25068388pdb.95.1426255350901; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 07:02:30 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from localhost (CPE-120-147-144-248.gdiv2.lon.bigpond.net.au. [120.147.144.248]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id lf13sm3783884pab.2.2015.03.13.07.02.28 for <20074@debbugs.gnu.org> (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 13 Mar 2015 07:02:29 -0700 (PDT) In-reply-to: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:100443 Archived-At: On 2015-03-14T00:20:52+1100, Stefan Monnier said: SM> Normally this should never happen. In practice there are various SM> cases where this can happen for two reasons: SM> - A bug. Some of those can be difficult to fix, tho. SM> - `inhibit-quit' is non-nil while running this inf-loop. In this SM> case, indeed, it's usually a bug in the Elisp code rather than in SM> the C code: code that runs with inhibit-quit (e.g. code run from a SM> timer) should be careful to avoid long run-times. This isn't SM> great, but it's what we have so far. *nod* i've never set `inhibit-quit` non-nil in my own code, but i imagine it's more than possible that something i was calling was setting it non-nil, so i'll keep that in mind. More generally, if i again encounter an unresponsive-Emacs scenario like the one i mentioned, i'll note it on help-gnu-emacs, to get others' input about whether or not it's an Emacs bug. Thanks! Alexis.