From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Severe lossage from unread-command-events Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 19:47:06 +0200 Message-ID: <87d1yvf339.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> References: <87egjh4u1h.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83pp30sd5l.fsf@gnu.org> <87k2t831gf.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <871tfgl0e2.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87wpx8jigl.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87pp2vf5f9.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83fv3roxlf.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1439228838 12422 80.91.229.3 (10 Aug 2015 17:47:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 17:47:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 10 19:47:18 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZOrAL-0007Cx-HI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 19:47:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59612 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZOrAK-0002yN-Se for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 13:47:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56461) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZOrAC-0002uJ-Rh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 13:47:12 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZOrAB-0007Ly-Pp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 13:47:08 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:54658) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZOrAB-0007Lu-MN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 13:47:07 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40244 helo=lola) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1ZOrAA-00086j-TI; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 13:47:07 -0400 Original-Received: by lola (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 55FC2DF35F; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 19:47:06 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <83fv3roxlf.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 10 Aug 2015 20:35:40 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:188697 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: David Kastrup >> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org >> Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 18:56:42 +0200 >> >> David Kastrup writes: >> >> > Looks like I can (and must) leave off the (cons t ...) for my use >> > case. I haven't seen any bad effects from doing so: events are looked >> > up in keymaps and recorded just fine so far. I don't know what the >> > implications of the t thing are. But other than that, things do look >> > good so far. >> >> Any chance for this patch going in anytime soon? Anything I should be >> doing here? > > I was waiting for you to tell whether it solves all the problems you > know about with pushing events onto unread-command-events. If you are > satisfied by what you see after applying the patch, I will push. So far the results looked good. I suspect that it does nothing about the "escaping e" problem of Artur. And I suspect that the "(cons t" feature will (still?) not work reliably. However, neither of those problems would appear to be caused by your patch, so there seems little point in delaying that patch. -- David Kastrup