From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Draft mode
Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2015 19:00:14 +0200
Message-ID: <87d1wpi9cx.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
References: <87io6w9p7y.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87io6vd7vl.fsf@gmx.us>
	<87r3l6jv55.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87oag95thw.fsf@gmx.us>
	<m2mvvt8ggk.fsf@tsdye.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34619)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1ZkEXc-0002sO-Kq
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Oct 2015 13:01:20 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1ZkEWY-0002KH-H0
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Oct 2015 12:59:40 -0400
Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::196]:49584)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1ZkEWY-0002F4-1E
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Oct 2015 12:58:34 -0400
In-Reply-To: <m2mvvt8ggk.fsf@tsdye.com> (Thomas S. Dye's message of "Thu, 08
	Oct 2015 06:36:59 -1000")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: "Thomas S. Dye" <tsd@tsdye.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us>

Thomas S. Dye <tsd@tsdye.com> writes:

> Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us> writes:
>
>>>> The interest of such functionality seems to be limited to people who
>>>> maintain broken-but-soon-to-be-fixed documents... It does not seem to
>>>> warrant prime real estate in the exporter IMO. Further, I don't think
>>>> 'draft' is the correct word for this, but that's of course minor.
>>>
>>> I couldn't find anything better. Suggestions welcome.
>>
>> I agree.  We already have the org-latex-classes, which a very different
>> from latex-proper classes.  This seems to cause a lot of confusion.
>> Perhaps we can limit such overlap in the future.
>>
>> It=E2=80=99s a "relaxed" mode.  I=E2=80=99m not sure what a good term fo=
r this is.
>
> Trial mode?

I think I will go with the straight to the point
`org-export-barf-on-invalid-link' variable.

However, not sure about the OPTIONS item.

  #+OPTIONS: ???:t

Regards,