From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#11865: Fwd: Re: 24.1.50; doxygen comments not highlighted in c++-mode Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2016 14:34:29 +1030 Message-ID: <87d1rilrxu.fsf@gnus.org> References: <5a95c7556a411b5988bc46867dbb99fd@tonotdo.com> <16d1f96d86592f9e5511b61a678e2f81@tonotdo.com> <87y4a8m9b2.fsf@gnus.org> <0C474D0B-86AF-4030-B4B4-87E8CBEC4A67@iotcl.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1456545985 28112 80.91.229.3 (27 Feb 2016 04:06:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2016 04:06:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Toon Claes , 11865@debbugs.gnu.org To: Toon Claes Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 27 05:06:13 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aZW8x-0003Yt-Lw for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2016 05:06:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53252 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aZW8x-0000ov-5S for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 23:06:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33910) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aZW8t-0000ll-18 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 23:06:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aZW8o-0001Lo-1a for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 23:06:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:50957) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aZW8n-0001Lk-UZ; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 23:06:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aZW8n-0000Va-PH; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 23:06:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bug-cc-mode@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2016 04:06:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11865 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,cc-mode X-GNU-PR-Keywords: fixed patch Original-Received: via spool by 11865-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11865.14565459031863 (code B ref 11865); Sat, 27 Feb 2016 04:06:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 11865) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Feb 2016 04:05:03 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48078 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aZW7r-0000Tz-0a for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 23:05:03 -0500 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:51467) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aZW7o-0000TP-Ki for 11865@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 23:05:01 -0500 Original-Received: from [175.103.25.178] (helo=mouse) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1aZW7O-0001nZ-8p; Sat, 27 Feb 2016 05:04:35 +0100 In-Reply-To: <0C474D0B-86AF-4030-B4B4-87E8CBEC4A67@iotcl.com> (Toon Claes's message of "Fri, 26 Feb 2016 09:03:27 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-MailScanner-ID: 1aZW7O-0001nZ-8p MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1457150675.17902@/MsUZsdR3kmli/XyoFEMgw X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:113928 Archived-At: Toon Claes writes: > I do not really agree. > > Let me explain in detail. > Only comment blocks like the following were recognized as gtkdoc: > /** > * This is the gtkdoc comment > */ > > I wanted also gtkdoc styling to be applied to: > /** This should be gtkdoc comment too */ > > I admit, the regexp I wrote back in the day was not correctly escaped. > But I was trying to achieve comments with 3 or more asterisks would > not get styled like gtkdoc comments. Can you supply a patch that will give the correct styling? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no