From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Allen Li <darkfeline@felesatra.moe>
Subject: Re: Bug: Bulk reschedule with reschedule logging on fails [8.3.4
 (8.3.4-5-gdc68d2-elpaplus @
 /home/tyria/.emacs.d/elpa/org-plus-contrib-20160229/)]
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 19:57:34 -0700
Message-ID: <87d1qwzbvl.fsf@jakuri.felesatra.moe>
References: <87a8m8nv3q.fsf@felesatra.moe> <87d1r2ll2q.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
	<87d1r1iomh.fsf@jakuri.lan> <87fuvum9v8.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
	micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47323)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <darkfeline@felesatra.moe>) id 1affB3-0004dj-51
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 22:57:46 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <darkfeline@felesatra.moe>) id 1affAy-00061u-6B
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 22:57:45 -0400
Received: from avalon.felesatra.moe ([78.129.218.37]:51485)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <darkfeline@felesatra.moe>) id 1affAy-00061T-0w
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 22:57:40 -0400
In-reply-to: <87fuvum9v8.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain


Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes:
>
> This raises another question, though. What is a reasonable behaviour for
> bulk schedule+log?

I can think of three reasonable options:

1. Prompt for a note, then apply it to all affected items.
2. Prompt for a note, then apply it only to items that are already
   scheduled (and hence rescheduled).
3. Don't attempt to add a note and just add timestamps.

Then there's the unreasonable option:

4. Prompt for a note for each item.

If I had to pick, I'd go with 2, but any of 1-3 is fine.  In this case,
having bulk scheduling work is more important than whether
org-log-reschedule is being faithfully applied, in my opinion.

Allen

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJW53oeAAoJEFInLQBbK3WndQwIAJyDYw9EkibXwAjGcgjfbGvo
0HX53AGlxcmAde+Rfaa5FJCL6qZadpxfAhdqVWKCSNBL7YNbgbgUyoqoKqD7VOIo
9Zm4a5acKO43wpy7wScyxmXAAl6NZPCYC/spFtixL8kxUYjOE8D7nyd03o7U+Bdx
strPgyakM9iMet1ziKqWPKRr0cxcQ75mgo0dkaszH5HFV0xWdwe3DRxTkO7SezjG
7aO8D+gunDvGzymDDmzr7uzlEVIzTV+c+jIAoI+1yc0K1FhtmLuRqibvCGdXchlR
oBb2j8I9f3M9lzfoCuM83o7qiyD+F3Gdv/j8IGwiaMP1vW2jYg3oNAcyklfzztE=
=lCQQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--