From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Marcin Borkowski Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Paragraph styles in doc strings Date: Mon, 09 May 2016 17:45:26 +0200 Message-ID: <87d1ovck15.fsf@mbork.pl> References: <878tzjjn3w.fsf@gnus.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1462810343 2817 80.91.229.3 (9 May 2016 16:12:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 9 May 2016 16:12:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon May 09 18:12:16 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aznNT-0005Po-8N for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 May 2016 17:45:47 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41976 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aznNS-00009e-EI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 May 2016 11:45:46 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33474) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aznNI-0008V0-He for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 May 2016 11:45:40 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aznND-0001hx-GG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 May 2016 11:45:36 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.mojserwer.eu ([2a01:5e00:2:52::8]:47065) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aznND-0001hs-92 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 May 2016 11:45:31 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.mojserwer.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id A881DB51A68; Mon, 9 May 2016 17:45:30 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.mojserwer.eu Original-Received: from mail.mojserwer.eu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.mojserwer.eu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5-eaI1lI0uUy; Mon, 9 May 2016 17:45:26 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (98-171.echostar.pl [213.156.98.171]) by mail.mojserwer.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6D60CB51A64; Mon, 9 May 2016 17:45:26 +0200 (CEST) User-agent: mu4e 0.9.13; emacs 25.1.50.9 In-reply-to: <878tzjjn3w.fsf@gnus.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2a01:5e00:2:52::8 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:203721 Archived-At: On 2016-05-09, at 16:57, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > So my favourite is definitely the "empty line" one. It's easy to write > (just use `M-q' at will), and I think it's easy to read. It does add > vertical space, so you get less information on the screen, but I think > it gains more in clarity what it loses in conciseness. +1 -- Marcin Borkowski http://octd.wmi.amu.edu.pl/en/Marcin_Borkowski Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science Adam Mickiewicz University