From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#25105: M-p in diff-mode jumps too far Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 01:42:42 -0500 Message-ID: <87d1frzcil.fsf_-_@users.sourceforge.net> References: <87a8aydxe4.fsf@gmail.com> <3c2e407b-8ba2-1791-15e6-a0be6dac2897@yandex.ru> <87fuknzem8.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1484290516 26918 195.159.176.226 (13 Jan 2017 06:55:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 06:55:16 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) Cc: Mark Oteiza , 25105@debbugs.gnu.org, Dmitry Gutov , Stefan Monnier , Dima Kogan To: Tino Calancha Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 13 07:55:11 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cRvlJ-0005BF-BN for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 07:54:57 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39425 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cRvlN-0004V2-MD for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 01:55:01 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55256) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cRvYs-0003Bx-GJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 01:42:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cRvYo-0006b5-JP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 01:42:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:36615) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cRvYo-0006ay-Fc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 01:42:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cRvYo-0006ke-3p for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 01:42:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 06:42:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25105 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 25105-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B25105.148428970525927 (code B ref 25105); Fri, 13 Jan 2017 06:42:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 25105) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Jan 2017 06:41:45 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52014 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cRvYW-0006k7-Ue for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 01:41:45 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-io0-f195.google.com ([209.85.223.195]:35412) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cRvYV-0006ju-8E for 25105@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 01:41:43 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-io0-f195.google.com with SMTP id m98so4715313iod.2 for <25105@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 22:41:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=PLFrQX6GDRsPPB8CTL4p/4TYYCNJTYKidxsiv8CKthU=; b=bHkoApNegmSRisgBLYPkM7ldYEjUcQjoDtkPU2gQ4T8A59Ml4MtJjPufReuuMFdnxG d9CQnmjlQewcD8s4oqHO08ojvHsxQZN0UQoKIWG504hMgMy7L+HTQ/abF+W3Il7tErmd AEDY4AIX1OwhXuJuxoXAQKE5m59ZqwK7NNsKF94Iei58PBjDSmzvg8yU556UQnMAdEGv ub6QMx2W9jBVEAOf9mgDGusIt8Ow67URUmEkS1ZYumjjStuJHoXpoFoX9yP3A0pan7vN G+JOLNx/lUo5Ve0WRU+3RXlBUSSGOmk13xaLlrgfmDzE/UWVTx458wQSkPnzUvbT1vN1 HlfQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=PLFrQX6GDRsPPB8CTL4p/4TYYCNJTYKidxsiv8CKthU=; b=kBLU/tBXseRwOZ3H3EwNssXqCzNH2o8ynQc02hMWc7VFVaH6s7mUziJmKCG6JQCOVE SB5ACyZtN1jU+8IaT4a5pJRgWrczx0z56oPz/IZCetl4tFS1cRW6+PaH1qsu6WZx7lAM T8DLktzRA4B8xW3r0oDdsjJqwdfwvA1C9izfvzqWKOYhOPVjCeKXJjypAaVWyW55YYxH lKBzQq8FQ7J7OS8HGpRF5We0FxBpkHGHOfuqoIYWlPubdRBpqcZC8cH8lANrZIeOhzZ/ QfDHwLglIIBk7YPN3VEdIzWYZQeR4oPynbw2Wq4ZCWa+Sy2zKOH1biOyyZ/MAHDKJz47 JUFg== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXK8USRO79lGNvtITY/+L3bxudOHMlGEVJdh38HRUkpW5DKsrA32257+B0f0TFBjMw== X-Received: by 10.107.13.7 with SMTP id 7mr4123059ion.122.1484289697456; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 22:41:37 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from zony ([45.2.7.65]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id c21sm6180233iod.38.2017.01.12.22.41.36 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Thu, 12 Jan 2017 22:41:36 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: (Tino Calancha's message of "Fri, 13 Jan 2017 15:26:44 +0900 (JST)") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:128056 Archived-At: Tino Calancha writes: >> >> I merged the bugs, and dropped #25400 from the cc list, because I'm >> getting duplicate emails everytime. > Thank you. Sorry for the duplicated e-mails :-( Hmm, I'm still getting duplicates. Maybe I shouldn't have merged? Oh well. >> >> I think the commit summary could be a bit friendlier, otherwise it looks >> good to me. > Thanks. I agree: if i read my own commit after some months, probably > i will not fully understand it. > I propose following more verbose one: > > Fix Bug#17544 I was thinking more about this summary line. And maybe add some higher level explanation before the ChangeLog entry about the problems being solved?