From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Andreas Schwab Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Skipping unexec via a big .elc file Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2017 16:12:22 +0100 Message-ID: <87d1fpwu95.fsf@linux-m68k.org> References: <52BDCC33-546C-4F47-A230-00EBC813B038@raeburn.org> <15CF14CC-C7DE-44BA-AC7D-F0BF1F160979@raeburn.org> <9463F91F-DB82-48E1-BE01-1E2BC8DA0766@raeburn.org> <831swxzbw8.fsf@gnu.org> <83y3z2wphb.fsf@gnu.org> <83tw9bb42m.fsf@gnu.org> <349ED8B9-C34B-495B-9FB5-E72CE6EFCA38@raeburn.org> <87inpni6xa.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <8360lmesso.fsf@gnu.org> <3B044D64-7C94-42D7-BE1B-7A9CA76C5A67@raeburn.org> <83k29xc49v.fsf@gnu.org> <83eg05c32y.fsf@gnu.org> <87inphx29r.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <83a8atbxl9.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1484406774 27063 195.159.176.226 (14 Jan 2017 15:12:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2017 15:12:54 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.91 (gnu/linux) Cc: raeburn@raeburn.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 14 16:12:49 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cSQ0P-0005C4-HN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2017 16:12:33 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48324 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cSQ0U-0003To-6z for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2017 10:12:38 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43639) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cSQ0O-0003Tj-Ex for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2017 10:12:33 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cSQ0N-000054-JK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2017 10:12:32 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([2001:a60:0:28:0:1:25:1]:48206) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cSQ0J-0008KE-Mp; Sat, 14 Jan 2017 10:12:27 -0500 Original-Received: from frontend01.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.182]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3v12zX1wVgz3hhx9; Sat, 14 Jan 2017 16:12:24 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (dynscan1.mnet-online.de [192.168.6.68]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3v12zX0Yt8zvkp3; Sat, 14 Jan 2017 16:12:24 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mnet-online.de Original-Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.8.182]) by localhost (dynscan1.mail.m-online.net [192.168.6.68]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E4ZqOW_eR-Fn; Sat, 14 Jan 2017 16:12:22 +0100 (CET) X-Auth-Info: lSAD7ZeHaVCOe38RqUPI5SN7yz4ZCbjFRurPeFk3tLv0Z2sbwREqwAvbA3gKtH/L Original-Received: from igel.home (ppp-88-217-30-182.dynamic.mnet-online.de [88.217.30.182]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Sat, 14 Jan 2017 16:12:22 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: by igel.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 606442C3E0B; Sat, 14 Jan 2017 16:12:22 +0100 (CET) X-Yow: I am covered with pure vegetable oil and I am writing a best seller! In-Reply-To: <83a8atbxl9.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 14 Jan 2017 15:05:54 +0200") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 2001:a60:0:28:0:1:25:1 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:211282 Archived-At: On Jan 14 2017, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Andreas Schwab >> Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2017 13:19:12 +0100 >> Cc: raeburn@raeburn.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org >> >> >> > The line number in the error message is bogus, it points to a require >> >> > line (that's a known issue with byte-compiler error reporting, I >> >> > think). >> >> >> >> It's not bogus, since the error was raised while the byte-compiler >> >> evaluated the form there. >> > >> > It's "bogus" in the sense that it isn't useful for finding the code >> > which triggered the error. >> >> It is as bogus as every Lisp error. > > On the contrary: most of them provide useful information about the > error locus. This one clearly didn't. It accurately tells you the form that caused the error, something you never get from a Lisp error. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."