From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: nljlistbox2@gmail.com (N. Jackson) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#25851: 25.2; GTK warning when starting Emacs when desktop file has more than one frame Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 10:34:04 -0400 Message-ID: <87d1d8xdsz.fsf@moondust.localdomain> References: <87a89c51qb.fsf@moondust.localdomain> <58D3804E.5030109@gmx.at> <4f44f0fb-96fe-4326-8a0c-c87e4ef17613@default> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1490279730 3564 195.159.176.226 (23 Mar 2017 14:35:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 14:35:30 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux) Cc: 25851@debbugs.gnu.org To: Martin Rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 23 15:35:22 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cr3pa-0007vX-Q7 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 15:35:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56818 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cr3pg-0004Lt-Lq for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 10:35:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54561) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cr3pU-0004IH-Ca for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 10:35:14 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cr3pO-0007C0-GZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 10:35:08 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:42951) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cr3pO-0007Bi-BH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 10:35:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cr3pO-0007az-2K for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 10:35:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: nljlistbox2@gmail.com (N. Jackson) Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 14:35:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25851 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 25851-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B25851.149027965229134 (code B ref 25851); Thu, 23 Mar 2017 14:35:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 25851) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Mar 2017 14:34:12 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41149 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cr3oa-0007Zq-Mf for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 10:34:12 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-it0-f66.google.com ([209.85.214.66]:36006) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cr3oZ-0007Zd-Fc for 25851@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 10:34:11 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-it0-f66.google.com with SMTP id 190so7938286itm.3 for <25851@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 07:34:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=KeoDF6YFm6hoCzQL4UYtox74yXUVXTMRNfXd/4q63zU=; b=EDlisXVUkARGt+3pMKYRpBfzUA8Fx7xlpjkwCqnVjoezwe0f1oMO/9xoaQyBvLgBZb EnZeoHNUWZ+2sNwAui/YFBH2jvP17HissHqvQbJxQIZubvSIdpU2FChDN1SlaCMqj061 7ybgSOJB+L96eR6+y6V9zDw9MFToP4zBrn+/Ja2DtjqQz1V+IvZeMwVzf3/jjIrT6tTf HUoxxw82jBPCfTieOjfxtYveDIPXZ+zIJjKmt8NXJA2Euyvgap2Jg6L9BmH/sgqUGqhE dtrw+cG5lOX8IXgVtYZMB5+ZDUH2I6YtOczfB8hQDr9HIGivONwUWDgCNhmidWiE7E8y pKEA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=KeoDF6YFm6hoCzQL4UYtox74yXUVXTMRNfXd/4q63zU=; b=tgmB0KMCtj4gcVX1EI12hOVVCCWc7XDx8o7JweYObOe2bxJjRYSQzEksy1lOQFGxjf OhYQAs8QTVJIS9WEsW6bOjYpWw+uLPsZDjSPUpz8FOXpmP3bg3rofUq3V6IuSNRpPQ4L q/IV20LjD33rKi/Dks3jAQFxfvYai0wnNkqUuvgmGFp7bytMyUA8dHw991urDwjF+p4v 6E3femdfpiXy1nlhk67c6fUkukP1fpk658T2QdV6Z6WlSnvo8dHb4ZEhs/nQyLnCgFae uUzKh5dG8Md9TdfZ+YBVsJZks7I5bOOqB6KcJzZtsIuGbc7LuKjrz0X/pa69UkfdyUqS BV0Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H0mGoMFziqRIP8wGjSbgFWFffaoPzKiGC8amnSNvbJSCD5FOHu6vMhGgh5z+gE0Zg== X-Received: by 10.36.13.70 with SMTP id 67mr2524130itx.65.1490279645924; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 07:34:05 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from moondust.localdomain.nodomain.none ([205.189.187.4]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k66sm1774552itg.8.2017.03.23.07.34.05 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Thu, 23 Mar 2017 07:34:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4f44f0fb-96fe-4326-8a0c-c87e4ef17613@default> (Drew Adams's message of "Thu, 23 Mar 2017 06:47:03 -0700 (PDT)") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:130844 Archived-At: At 06:47 -0700 on Thursday 2017-03-23, Drew Adams wrote: > > As one user of multiple frames (and multiple desktops) I would > (naively perhaps) expect a desktop state to restore frames as > they were when they were saved, modulo anything that might be > strictly impossible or unfeasible to do. I agree with Drew here. a user would reasonably expect that part of the job of the desktop feature is restoring frames to their former positions. > If frame positions are not restored in general (again, modulo > any necessary exceptions that might exist) that would suggest > that there is little point in saving and restoring frames. There is also, of course, the re-creation of all the buffers and the re-assignment of the right buffers to the right windows on the right frames. This is at least as important IMO. > Size and position are among the most important attributes of a > frame, and if a user bothers to use multiple frames then it is > almost certainly the case that their sizes and positions are > important. Well, in my case, my display is small and all frames are maximized, so the position of the frames is not important. So I disagree with the "almost certainly", but otherwise I agree completely. N.