From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Andreas Politz Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Overlays as an AA-tree Date: Sat, 06 May 2017 10:05:39 +0200 Message-ID: <87d1bm1kbw.fsf@luca> References: <87d1jylv43.fsf@fastmail.com> <87o9yc9v30.fsf@hochschule-trier.de> <87a89vaes3.fsf@hochschule-trier.de> <87efz7n0g5.fsf@fastmail.com> <877f4uah6i.fsf@hochschule-trier.de> <83k28u1uyz.fsf@gnu.org> <871suxs9ad.fsf@hochschule-trier.de> <837f4pxpdc.fsf@gnu.org> <877f4lls9e.fsf@hochschule-trier.de> <838tp0q3k8.fsf@gnu.org> <87vas4owus.fsf@luca> <87r32rpfhv.fsf@luca> <87vas07zdn.fsf@luca> <877f1xu4ra.fsf@luca> <87pofn12vh.fsf@luca> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1494057969 11225 195.159.176.226 (6 May 2017 08:06:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 6 May 2017 08:06:09 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: =?utf-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Pit-Claudel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat May 06 10:06:05 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d6uj7-0002q3-8p for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 06 May 2017 10:06:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50423 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d6ujC-0001oj-Vu for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 06 May 2017 04:06:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50490) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d6uj7-0001ob-CB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 May 2017 04:06:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d6uj2-0003T2-Ej for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 May 2017 04:06:05 -0400 Original-Received: from gateway-a.fh-trier.de ([143.93.54.181]:43357) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d6uj2-0003Rn-4x for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 May 2017 04:06:00 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by Amavisd-new + McAfee uvscan + ClamAV [Rechenzentrum Hochschule Trier (RZ/HT)] Original-Received: from localhost (ip5f5bdeb7.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de [95.91.222.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: politza) by gateway-a.fh-trier.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 412E2179C9FA; Sat, 6 May 2017 10:05:44 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple; d=hochschule-trier.de; s=default; t=1494057944; bh=akEWTQp69hcg41GfD3KsNXEmczY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=DdXRgyEt9CvsT6Sx1St8DOGVCpmG3ZJOshdH3paXq48MQrd9hJnSve3v/gscRf1bZ yKYlOJzpR8NiRu9tXUx1hw1rhMihIT1o7PAsK9XakJEjPQ8+tFOkJClzekoTAA5GZ3 /FTFZxYloOYpXKTkwR67Vmb77yJcoO8yAXSX7WAc= In-Reply-To: (=?utf-8?Q?=22Cl=C3=A9ment?= Pit-Claudel"'s message of "Fri, 5 May 2017 18:22:19 -0400") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 143.93.54.181 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:214606 Archived-At: Cl=C3=A9ment Pit-Claudel writes: >> Is there some benchmark code available to run ? > > There was a thread about this [...] I remember now and talked about this. The result was that both implementations take about the same time, given that overlay-recenter is used appropriately. If not, the tree was about 4 times faster. -ap