From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Noam Postavsky Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#35663: 27.0.50; Eldoc support for apply Date: Thu, 09 May 2019 20:58:30 -0400 Message-ID: <87d0krjfbd.fsf@gmail.com> References: <871s17uq15.fsf@web.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="251441"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux) Cc: 35663@debbugs.gnu.org To: Michael Heerdegen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 10 02:59:13 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hOtsW-0013JW-V6 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 May 2019 02:59:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34796 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hOtsV-0000Ku-W8 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 09 May 2019 20:59:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:55657) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hOtsN-0000Kc-F5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 May 2019 20:59:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hOtsM-00016Y-Ko for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 May 2019 20:59:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:51438) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hOtsM-00016N-EQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 May 2019 20:59:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hOtsM-0006wj-7b for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 May 2019 20:59:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Noam Postavsky Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 10 May 2019 00:59:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 35663 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 35663-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B35663.155744992026671 (code B ref 35663); Fri, 10 May 2019 00:59:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 35663) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 May 2019 00:58:40 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36748 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hOtrz-0006w7-Pa for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 09 May 2019 20:58:39 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-it1-f181.google.com ([209.85.166.181]:34627) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hOtry-0006vs-2l for 35663@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 09 May 2019 20:58:38 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-it1-f181.google.com with SMTP id p18so6319454itm.1 for <35663@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 09 May 2019 17:58:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=cHzHjlq46eqDNP0LJMvIxHcfNEk4/NGcQ0aOKee1uyc=; b=kiPyAPs6+oUoRFlY4K20dHUCQySjMPEdSc07AWAtTVHEpUPiKMm7SCo/GXzQvVXXVd BZATwQEs1pMDk3kyA4sh2tACt+wcDEDz11RztMPx/cZlpa1lqvdlffDChA2p4qlif4qj 9LQpWCrq3yvibWjkNYJG6V1X4HxqJGSnxjXcV7Q3PLsW0nHOgazNFhkJ2hluk3E1TLZa /q9PTXYyIy9MciyMkjxM2BTQriyoQTX99tnE8eSyP59S23Mr2oebmHgrzQhXrl3QlhaJ /k/Nig7nJXFwE9/ZmYUWgxyGcUIvGk/0OUOZ0UQz72Y8RgpWSosbAbYaMrnP+HO/u1eG dtsA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=cHzHjlq46eqDNP0LJMvIxHcfNEk4/NGcQ0aOKee1uyc=; b=Eeg+OeoYTnjHzF49jD/ZWOcqWbJf/nt/UPHD7E7mI2e1O78225E0eTt7Ay8cBj3poF z3pyqM559HAzd5TBxBetMg3NiZ+XXCRkqabAL+8oF4K/ezdEYf+ZAWEx4/Sf0CHRBoEQ coGmfY3shDTFsZefUPKoTwt8oBpT1ynETQJ5gplWTngP2iG3ez0IPvBFVIDXn9kP40QX S8rPAJdppoXmc8VhfwkzUgXXyZlgINbXTD79E78cBMh6PbAa1nCY8dradMse3fzVuhB3 xejkSv3FCQU35RUix5QBsz5kVGwVMrFrWhg/60XjUuS/Jl1NkP4fdq/p22SbIFetTurj vxLw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAX9NqN5MSWJOAf+ZCMG/rnldQePNWPuWRzqlGmng/e3jP/Jbq2R UXwkD/EmBK9ft7Q2jjYfYeunN8Gt X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwSu9SwR8Gihp0O8jjkD6F2o8cUGxd8Ios/ZpG/KUGt4oxoDaZudPmkCW1I0UwQvA5H9h8caw== X-Received: by 2002:a24:c585:: with SMTP id f127mr5989037itg.159.1557449912246; Thu, 09 May 2019 17:58:32 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from minid (cbl-45-2-119-34.yyz.frontiernetworks.ca. [45.2.119.34]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u194sm2046846ita.1.2019.05.09.17.58.31 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Thu, 09 May 2019 17:58:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <871s17uq15.fsf@web.de> (Michael Heerdegen's message of "Fri, 10 May 2019 02:11:34 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:159012 Archived-At: Michael Heerdegen writes: > Hello, > > when editing something like > > (apply #'call-process > (car command) > nil > (if stderr-file (list t stderr-file) t) > nil > (append (cdr command) (list archive name))) > > eldoc support would be useful to see the argument names of > 'call-process' instead of the signature of 'apply'. Yes, I've kind of wanted something like this for a while. > + ((and (memq (car current-fnsym) '(apply apply-partially)) funcall too please? :) > We could also make the displayed text more special to show that this is > actually an 'apply' call and handle the last argument specially but I > think it would be overkill to add so much code for this side case. Yeah, and I doubt any sort of eldoc display would be of much use for the last apply arg anyway.