From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Po Lu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Making Emacs more friendly to newcomers Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 11:10:23 +0800 Message-ID: <87d07yrj6o.fsf@yahoo.com> References: <87h7xe79l7.fsf@yahoo.com> <87h7xdbne4.fsf@yahoo.com> <87lfmput2r.fsf@pm.me> <878siorvl7.fsf@yahoo.com> <875zdsc8bt.fsf@pm.me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="114475"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, ndame@protonmail.com To: Theodor Thornhill Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 23 05:15:53 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jRSL8-000Tbk-Lw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 05:15:50 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34564 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jRSL7-0000Vk-IZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 23:15:49 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52406) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jRSJL-0006Z3-RP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 23:14:34 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jRSHt-0006Nj-RD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 23:13:59 -0400 Original-Received: from sonic316-48.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com ([66.163.187.174]:38967) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jRSHt-0006Lm-BY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 23:12:29 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1587611547; bh=bxEJzy3jkJ34sg97FwpT0v9yM+6g6OIKyWrqqhcuM7c=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From:Subject; b=SfY+BQ3vFBLfAtuvhGNP+dCHChte32iJOTuB7gCJpr021zuePUJBO2xlOtoeNzD+o8JfFr6xerjuI8M0kIr1w/2WGEWg4PDDBbZ8QM2M5vtUXlHadLfR8xXcUGIhqOxezI6sjEIYimQ7VkF1BuI5Nz1jQioFxgJPBj9vM4CW+ypl3vRnXDa1pnss22FfCKnkzdEb3NPaQCtpsoShXbRAI+cqV1efDEJ+f2/Buwfg1z+j8M+txUvP8bQ0jr2FiIJr5C4Zc7jM9i6cyqCv/GqS+KYQCeZPs0vbbWkAUnTQLHT3cuTnhFlTYKs4duXkqDowj7lyZIjbYlKYDu8StmfQng== X-YMail-OSG: N_6BpMEVRDvd.miR6A7lED5GPdAEx7ojsA-- Original-Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic316.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 03:12:27 +0000 Original-Received: by smtp424.mail.sg3.yahoo.com (VZM Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID d07418f6dfc908b4da8bcc03d3b37b60; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 03:10:25 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <875zdsc8bt.fsf@pm.me> (Theodor Thornhill's message of "Wed, 22 Apr 2020 07:01:44 +0000") X-Mailer: WebService/1.1.15756 hermes Apache-HttpAsyncClient/4.1.4 (Java/11.0.6) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=66.163.187.174; envelope-from=luangruo@yahoo.com; helo=sonic316-48.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/04/22 23:12:27 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.1-3.10 X-Received-From: 66.163.187.174 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:247561 Archived-At: Theodor Thornhill writes: > Yeah. However, there is one thing with this approach. I took a look at > the eglot-fsharp.el (part of fsharp-mode, which is GPL v3 > btw). Downloading of the particular server seems to be almost no issue > at all. Configuring servers, though, is an issue. Should it be eglots > responsibility to do that, or individual language modes? Consider at > some point in the future, when Eglot is as integrated with emacs as say, > syntax highlighting or indenting - should *-mode.el configure its own > lsp config? I'm just a little bit concerned this will cause maintainers > of third party lang-modes not to really care. At least if lsp-mode > already provides lsp-*.el preconfigured anyways. Yeah, perhaps we could have a centralized database of language servers and their configurations for Eglot? That would be nice.