From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#44273: "total used in directory 19 available 5.2 GiB" Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2020 09:36:51 +0100 Message-ID: <87d011tom4.fsf@gmx.de> References: <87sg9zgchl.5.fsf@jidanni.org> <9FFBEBAF-FBB3-4AC9-950E-70B3927032F9@acm.org> <87h7qevdfc.fsf@gnus.org> <7B559E59-D3CA-4515-B17C-336029B7FBFA@acm.org> <877dravck1.fsf@gnus.org> <83DA3F8B-E525-43F6-8A72-A5AF6C0EEA38@acm.org> <87pn52tx05.fsf@gnus.org> <83mu06cqjl.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="779"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: mattiase@acm.org, Lars Ingebrigtsen , jidanni@jidanni.org, 44273@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 29 09:38:38 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kY3S9-00007J-UO for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 09:38:37 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59732 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kY3S8-0002zd-Jb for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 04:38:36 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46794) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kY3Ra-0002zR-Kc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 04:38:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:40149) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kY3Ra-00023b-AG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 04:38:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kY3Ra-00052Q-7j for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 04:38:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Albinus Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2020 08:38:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44273 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: wontfix patch Original-Received: via spool by 44273-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B44273.160396063319309 (code B ref 44273); Thu, 29 Oct 2020 08:38:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 44273) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Oct 2020 08:37:13 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51695 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kY3Qn-00051N-B3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 04:37:13 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.20]:59085) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kY3Ql-000518-PP for 44273@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 04:37:13 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1603960614; bh=1yvQWSnoK08pXUyYMtqdemgfP0Zq2MvGiswe5s2VF4E=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=QfWEbeHmqDPmVPRVuHmit8EgrA28BuB2oKryoT7QKB+z042fhGfN+FgqqgGzL69Ku zUqv+7pVdmaUvbXrMTOZL9a+NRdwokCgVYDjtXXfFDV1VsQcaDzI8BEa934/Ny20yY W9SgR/bmT6X7j9V8kYwlaiCYoTqug3dHiJCbP2Tw= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Original-Received: from gandalf.gmx.de ([79.140.118.53]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx105 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1N2E1G-1kNcoC1lHS-013b3c; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 09:36:54 +0100 In-Reply-To: <83mu06cqjl.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 28 Oct 2020 17:34:54 +0200") X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:jvLXDUomXapMqEOgq603o5bA7Rhb5uuIDEk2YcUeJSJfFJGREfQ gvZO2T6gHWgnLla1MM3oBn9vST0F6RwKyxNYYh7L452SLKfMCJP2AIgpwdh73rWf1HT8dmf 5GvOeyTdPLIS0qLHgFPevcJl7EuVes9EoNTYw5bZwOxhfsap4DUbp8hXXEhSemmH4it3lQQ HZIyMfLMaDg8J+2D3KaNw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:uUQVIedNwNg=:JiaA7Xj93OKAL6L9zIn0sf AQPNms+2+lnHACgSzPAb6J6DuqsFPQjRiiJksEPwoCRK91pCiBjV2jB5TbOVUINlMgOfrSTBs nTNqe+2QTRIZxH2PgFcrJsN1IsV12chy+hu/XMeSYWsc50Br81MWTD+4EtXsOIKzQjp+QF/R+ CemoJaXDrX0slOOU8yHqSMMl4iGJIlf2OgLEMPXXQBnOhVuQgyFF8HjnKdr+uvInGQAGg8Gme zTvBeyHmW5hD5c4Oy1NAh2l6gIaMOUhEtEDJk+Aj1m19IJCYSgOZZSfR3cvmQsbB1Cg3ddMcS gRmMvX4M0D/qL0jj7oRmYEii7aysmmNLwrVcbZ/Ju1tRjuqGZWljL8zEMRpTb+5xqJOpK/JcB LT71ecr/JocVT5gMuwZhDJxeoy9CBqmJzNTrnknxOog6CAdirF1j8QLs+9hzRc2/UIkGIS/U1 1Ws1KFPPVVWLhhuhLU75CE4kXDBF/mGuAmHxp0L79GCoZEQ/QfJKsNPqu9ERz/U72K1xsDey3 bBCAGQvKnWAmZkmOHzwQ22DqP8RYZf59nsmqtX2mrOPq5Jyp5C3AruFV59SvWEeWdYFehvQxM GTKczLBZQJvVp6Yi3SP5Rn1XnrxByNFyKKe8vdBAQqnryemstWPAbsSE6nZEcGoqUMPmxMiz/ w8/mLPEUvP3q3ST2LkN2wV9r/fKSvtPv5m5qrTQgXlgeQ1iD1MKgIsK+50h6wGiPB1w24T+TR 2I0v1N7DNER5g/Hgfb8KVZlPlsQUDUNdp9KAzVlKXhPc2x3ZeQcI8cRBLJi5f+Rwc0kjaEmI X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:191941 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> True. If `ls-lisp' (or something similar) isn't fast enough, then it >> should be pretty easy to add a C-level function for efficient directory >> reading. > > Are you sure it's reading the directory that takes the lion's share of > the time? Maybe it's inserting the file information, one file at a > time, into a buffer? Or something else? > > That's why I suggested to profile and benchmark this thing. > >> (But we'd still need the parser for Tramp.) > > Tramp could always use what it does now, or use ls-lisp, or something > else. Counting in the sources, there are already 4 different implementations of insert-directory in Tramp. One of it uses ls-lisp, another uses a remote "ls" call. If there shall be a reimplementation, I would even consider to add another implementation, based on Perl or Python. This shall minimize performance penalties. Best regards, Michael.