From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Emanuel Berg via Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Org to Markdown programmatically Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 22:38:52 +0200 Message-ID: <87czu47w6b.fsf@zoho.eu> References: <87a6paj2e2.fsf@zoho.eu> <87bl9q95e3.fsf@yandex.com> <8735v2fdtg.fsf@zoho.eu> <87tunhbq9i.fsf@zoho.eu> <87sg318a6o.fsf@zoho.eu> Reply-To: Emanuel Berg Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="36495"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:CC+SyoTx8UcWabovzzQ+iXqeQXM= Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed May 05 22:40:30 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1leOJp-0009La-GP for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 22:40:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38004 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1leOJo-0001PF-G0 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 16:40:28 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60946) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1leOIX-0001OG-CF for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 16:39:09 -0400 Original-Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]:49080) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1leOIN-0001ii-HI for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 16:39:07 -0400 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1leOIL-0007BV-Ri for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 22:38:57 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Mail-Copies-To: never Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.254.214; envelope-from=geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io X-Spam_score_int: -16 X-Spam_score: -1.7 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.7 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:129499 Archived-At: Jean Louis wrote: >>>> Anyway found lots of small mistakes that I corrected. I run >>>> it on all my blog post pages - and this article by far >>>> scored the highest, 79% >>>> >>>> https://dataswamp.org/~incal/blog/box-10/marco-antonio-barrera.html >>> >>> Scored for which term? >> >> Overall score. > > Overall score of how, what? Where? When I applied the Android app "SEO Check" to the all the pages and fixed everything it suggested - and the suggestions were very good, not just classic SEO stuff (see previous posts). Also, the app is awesome, organized, fast, good interface, no ads or disruptive elements, none of the bad stuff we associate with smartphone apps... Try it, and see if you can beat my 79% :) This also score 79% now BTW: https://dataswamp.org/~incal/blog/tree-house/tree-house-rooftop.html And again I agree with the tool! Probably the best one! > I like popping. I don't know why would the word "iterate" > not relate to `while' here. If you iterate the material naturally with a loop that fits the purpose you don't have to pop. It is a poor man's way of doing it. > Show me how would you iterate on the above function. See other my other post. > When there are 2 elements to take out of the list and do > something with it, I like to pop it twice. Very handy, and > why not. If you use the right loop it does that for you. > Since I have started changing `dolist' to `while' that is what > happened, there is often pop. That's right, since `while' doesn't act on the material, you have to do it explicitly instead. -- underground experts united https://dataswamp.org/~incal