From: Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@posteo.net>
To: Samuel Wales <samologist@gmail.com>
Cc: Jonas Olofsson <jonas.olofsson@apple.com>, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] Agenda not sorting by priority THEN todo state (todo state ignored) [9.6.1 (9.6.1-??-fe92a3c @ /Users/polofsson/.emacs.d/.local/straight/build-28.2/org/)]
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2023 11:45:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87cz4yxtia.fsf@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJcAo8spC7BsFzRO1bDYqYby_H8dkJ6HTBFRojvwSVNimQXfeQ@mail.gmail.com>
Samuel Wales <samologist@gmail.com> writes:
> i find that when 2 things are being conflated, whether in software or
> in anything else, it is useful to change the name of both of them for
> maximum clarity, future git searches, etc.
>
> thus, perhaps i would suggest somthign like this slight tweak instead.
>
> priority-cookie-up
> priority-cookie-and-planning-urgency-up
I do not like the idea of changing both the names. The current change
will ensure that existing uses of "priority-up"/"priority-down" sorting
strategies won't be affected too much. Forcing every Org user who
customized agenda sorting to change the variable values is not
acceptable.
Note that the patch, despite changing the actual meaning of
priority-up/down, makes it more conforming with
`org-agenda-sorting-strategy' docstring. So, this change is, in fact,
safe.
> if not too verbose. reasoning: urgency is occasionally considered
> orthogonal to priority in some philosophies, and some users have
> :urgent: tags. so this might eliminate slightly more confusion in
> principle.
I am neutral wrt "urgency" term. We can use some other.
I do not like the verbosity. Even something like
"priority-and-urgency-up/down" sounds awkward, IMHO.
--
Ihor Radchenko // yantar92,
Org mode contributor,
Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>.
Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>,
or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-24 15:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-19 1:07 [BUG] Agenda not sorting by priority THEN todo state (todo state ignored) [9.6.1 (9.6.1-??-fe92a3c @ /Users/polofsson/.emacs.d/.local/straight/build-28.2/org/)] Jonas Olofsson
2023-03-22 11:28 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-03-23 0:56 ` Samuel Wales
2023-03-23 11:28 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-03-24 3:54 ` Samuel Wales
2023-03-24 3:56 ` Samuel Wales
2023-03-24 11:45 ` Ihor Radchenko [this message]
2023-03-25 5:59 ` Samuel Wales
2023-04-02 9:47 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-04-03 0:30 ` Samuel Wales
2023-04-03 8:59 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-04-06 9:44 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-04-06 23:37 ` Samuel Wales
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87cz4yxtia.fsf@localhost \
--to=yantar92@posteo.net \
--cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
--cc=jonas.olofsson@apple.com \
--cc=samologist@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.