From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#62538: 29.0.60; Setting eglot-report-progress dir-locally doesn't work Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2023 09:19:25 +0100 Message-ID: <87cz4qy7le.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87pm8qu0xw.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="11005"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: 62538@debbugs.gnu.org To: Augusto Stoffel Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 30 10:18:23 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1phnUF-0002d5-IZ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 30 Mar 2023 10:18:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1phnTw-00024B-Qe; Thu, 30 Mar 2023 04:18:04 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1phnTv-00023n-AM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Mar 2023 04:18:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1phnTu-0003KH-OQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Mar 2023 04:18:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1phnTu-0007rv-H0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Mar 2023 04:18:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2023 08:18:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 62538 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 62538-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B62538.168016425230211 (code B ref 62538); Thu, 30 Mar 2023 08:18:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 62538) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Mar 2023 08:17:32 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55698 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1phnTQ-0007rC-B7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Mar 2023 04:17:32 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wr1-f52.google.com ([209.85.221.52]:33357) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1phnTN-0007qx-R2 for 62538@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Mar 2023 04:17:30 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-f52.google.com with SMTP id j24so18201288wrd.0 for <62538@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 30 Mar 2023 01:17:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; t=1680164244; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date :references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=wcjutXL08hAo12eNWkqDfepfxHOV9TvkLKI3vvVzNT0=; b=ZcgWdrMlfZ/LU4CwJuEcOmfrGcY0djv0g3agz9vTy28rXWNkyMYEUFf7Yt/BS4aLJN UeIoFQVjeZFMPjvGR2gbrwwkjJ795h/81gIY74P9IN2GRcYTJMVIcUYdGAqfLKzQksLs DgOwGrg9mHSl4btmNUDFVzSRhTh2kQHu5hisQxAJNBYvSVnu+YBEtQBGOJAUcKTo4EuN vGEb0wp4pavIw8kaF3KBjTFNzGluVLq09ijPoiaSOfMgTZLzu4ONpYJEvzPPJ4NTjlxA 9iHV3xgdkh/6nq8MZtBJNx7XtXPmm2op2pCBPoH6oyFVekMq/+8ns944/rf6yB3i0z+o QXAQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1680164244; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date :references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=wcjutXL08hAo12eNWkqDfepfxHOV9TvkLKI3vvVzNT0=; b=eISVSKkaZ/Qr5MPMxV7qpmfexLW0JzdMiEpqdA6tN9ChZwCKS/8VgCJ5Y43ftqoQfa THwPeqz0jxuVmKDU/CYJainRp2SZuZHLr5wjj032utQNoc+tA4WT6l/DmCiCt732uFvV P1XpsOucHX5669IIdWvp1kbjgZ8o4JaI1O06FUiCn+5TrgDOjcKrlhbviLR5oyMgZ9F2 BGCiPD5eFIzMmSYGxEVnM2gWgtIiyyWWFs0STYqtUXfK1DdhrlIe6VLa7hSznylx4ezd GBV2CAIHgmxOjcRKlQ3YurwpeWm6yLJnqZk5YDsIhHFLbIGvxM18wJqv8b+yqxAXwrl4 vKIQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AAQBX9eM0Q7eMpOZB8Y6y+SP2LuwkDwI1FPos/1bqiuub1r2asO7IE2i qvocVi2Ph6zCyMumbL0GNUp5JjAFcbw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350ZJSqDlmttCUNLdDNqKdPTuQ4oSR7DBmDD2D+ENcN0TduXsV8RyB6Z8/7sIz7S+RJQJO4XHSA== X-Received: by 2002:adf:ff87:0:b0:2e4:e508:4a8f with SMTP id j7-20020adfff87000000b002e4e5084a8fmr513165wrr.46.1680164243885; Thu, 30 Mar 2023 01:17:23 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from krug (87-196-72-128.net.novis.pt. [87.196.72.128]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s17-20020a5d4251000000b002d1801018e2sm32205404wrr.63.2023.03.30.01.17.22 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 30 Mar 2023 01:17:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87pm8qu0xw.fsf@gmail.com> (Augusto Stoffel's message of "Thu, 30 Mar 2023 09:56:43 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:258903 Archived-At: Augusto Stoffel writes: > I set eglot-report-progress to nil in the "nil" section of my project's > .dir-locals.el, but I still see progress reports in the mode line. > > If I add a debug message to the corresponding eglot-handle-notification > method, I see that the "(when eglot-report-progress" is evaluated in a > temp buffer and so doesn't pick up the dir-local value. Ah. It wasn't meant to be used buffer-locally. But if it's an easy fix, there so reason it shouldn't be. > (By the way, Eglot was feeling very sluggish until I decided to disable > these notifications. It reminded me of a similar situation with garbage > collection, where disabling a message changed user's perception of > latency in the process. Or is this an urban legend?) OK I will see what I can do. Jo=C3=A3o