From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Steinar Bang Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#62630: 27.1; Emacs is unable to open some jar files Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2023 20:07:43 +0200 Message-ID: <87cz4kj0uo.fsf@dod.no> References: <87lejarldj.fsf@dod.no> <838rf9wvi8.fsf@gnu.org> <87mt3pk0gd.fsf@dod.no> <87iledjyy5.fsf@dod.no> <87edp1jym1.fsf@dod.no> <87a5zpjx9n.fsf@dod.no> <83zg7pul7v.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="23685"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) Cc: 62630@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 03 20:08:21 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pjObM-0005yQ-W2 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 03 Apr 2023 20:08:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pjOb6-0002yn-8q; Mon, 03 Apr 2023 14:08:04 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pjOb5-0002yP-3w for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Apr 2023 14:08:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pjOb4-0002kn-Rx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Apr 2023 14:08:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pjOb4-0005WU-GN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Apr 2023 14:08:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Steinar Bang Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2023 18:08:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 62630 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 62630-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B62630.168054527421217 (code B ref 62630); Mon, 03 Apr 2023 18:08:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 62630) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Apr 2023 18:07:54 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45211 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pjOaw-0005W9-3F for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Apr 2023 14:07:54 -0400 Original-Received: from cadalora.bang.priv.no ([46.43.15.90]:55716) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pjOau-0005Vv-60 for 62630@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Apr 2023 14:07:52 -0400 Original-Received: from marquez (unknown [84.210.69.52]) by cadalora.bang.priv.no (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BA283100511; Mon, 3 Apr 2023 19:07:45 +0100 (BST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=dod.no; s=sb; t=1680545266; bh=2RoShE9yhWyYkWADZqi+Z1Y1sqZRvwLmRii1XnS9RC8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=Dw/EsRiOp3QMaGmJkH5qKD8yqBINhzibyuLyfZc1PeYeD+eE0JGxpM52nIb0QDRJE GTwh/ElnncDkr9BbeZ22WwhmprP9U3FvFeT2rhwXvoYZR/9ZZ1mDR95tNGMvBJE43W 1gjHnPh/NXiVZV1M5xduVJsqn1OtBUGeC5wuiieg= In-Reply-To: <83zg7pul7v.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 03 Apr 2023 16:52:20 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:259199 Archived-At: >>>>> Eli Zaretskii : > Yes, see my other message in this discussion. > I guess we can now close this bug, as there's no Emacs bug here? Yes, there is no emacs bug, so this bug can be closed. I have added yours and Andreas' comments to the editorconfig-emacs issue I opened: https://github.com/editorconfig/editorconfig-emacs/issues/294#issuecomment-1494756030