Re: [ELPA] New Package: phpinspect.el

[Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net>]

Hugo Thunnissen <devel@hugot.nl> writes:

> On 8/12/23 06:56, Stefan Monnier wrote:
>>> I would like to propose my package, phpinspect.el, to be added to GNU Elpa.
>> Done.
>>
>> AFAICT the code has currently some significant problems in terms of
>> dependencies which make its compilation fail because variables are used
>> by macros during compilation when the var has not yet been defined, or
>> macros are used before they're defined, etc...
>>
>> The patch below seems to make the compilation go through (and fixes
>> various warnings), but there are a lot of compilation warnings left
>> which you might want to check.  It also includes a few FIXMEs.
>>
>>
>>          Stefan
>>
>>
>
> And here I was thinking that I had fixed all of the byte compilation
> problems.. Turns out it was only working because I byte compiled
> everything within the same emacs session. I made some changes and
> think things should be in order now. At least, the following shell
> script doesn't seem to result in any errors:
>
> for file in ./*.el; do
>     cask emacs -batch -L . --eval '(setq byte-compile-error-on-warn
> t)' -f batch-byte-compile "$file" || break
> done

I am not familiar with Cask, what does this provide over a simple
Makefile?

> I see some warnings in your log that concern files in the "benchmark"
> and "test" directories. These files are not required for the package
> to function. Can these be excluded from the ELPA build somehow? I have
> seen some projects use a "lisp" directory for their source code, is
> that the recommended approach for this?

You can add an .elpaignore file to your package root.  You can list all
files in there that you do not with to have added to a package tarball.
The file is passed to GNU tar's -X option (see (info "(tar) exclude")).

> Thanks,
>
> - Hugo