From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ihor Radchenko Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: New Package for NonGNU-ELPA: clojure-ts-mode Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2023 13:29:11 +0000 Message-ID: <87cyz3s5lk.fsf@localhost> References: <87il9kksqz.fsf@dfreeman.email> <83r0nok8s4.fsf@gnu.org> <87il90znco.fsf@yahoo.com> <1977fbef-307b-bcf4-9448-64f26916dd65@gutov.dev> <87edjozlqq.fsf@yahoo.com> <43ddad10-49dd-1c49-ebfe-51689780b315@gutov.dev> <83jztgk410.fsf@gnu.org> <83edjojx8c.fsf@gnu.org> <8734zzv7vk.fsf@localhost> <83edjjecmx.fsf@gnu.org> <87wmxbtsd4.fsf@localhost> <83bkeneb8j.fsf@gnu.org> <87ledrtqzx.fsf@localhost> <87a5u7sal0.fsf@yahoo.com> <87bkento99.fsf@localhost> <871qfjs855.fsf@yahoo.com> <87wmxbs7a1.fsf@localhost> <83wmxbcq0a.fsf@gnu.org> <87fs3zs60s.fsf@localhost> <83ttsfcpiy.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="20006"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: luangruo@yahoo.com, stefankangas@gmail.com, dmitry@gutov.dev, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 31 15:29:20 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qbhjb-0004wS-RZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 31 Aug 2023 15:29:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qbhj8-0004RF-C6; Thu, 31 Aug 2023 09:28:50 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qbhj2-0004Qg-Lc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Aug 2023 09:28:44 -0400 Original-Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qbhiz-0007sg-Fo for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Aug 2023 09:28:44 -0400 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34BC124002D for ; Thu, 31 Aug 2023 15:28:39 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1693488519; bh=vLF8uvcyaTK0zFkEMygm0HR57dKLx+0W6MBjPCRzpPI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:From; b=NS2d4oUb+uHPjl+rylwzsP+ma7KptE+JZPD60LoEf80QQAb0nodj4+npX7hJOi1go i7CZEZ1/tr9EG0gYZB7l0WYUHvklKLVKbooibvYU10pQPofjJgddvN1wMUtLzVjZC3 KKfQA1Q8a2t4IGMjQdSIDB1GFsBjxJ/VOh0COchDv4AX5qfuObiPx6KaRILGigHZ2q 9/+9Qroz5YiEoDQVNCL1J5K9TV9vutJ4mtC80QUEAAcdKkbsC4OFeQKJY69mrQ9pyF ePXx4i6iQ+58N2PxbsnJuqNqWNswEvsWgaJFPGUjbG8JK2n4NJRNfk3GyQ7yIx+00X kuW0MK+iyppfQ== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4Rc26t2Cszz6tsf; Thu, 31 Aug 2023 15:28:38 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <83ttsfcpiy.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.65; envelope-from=yantar92@posteo.net; helo=mout01.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:309661 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> Do you mean that one fix introducing new bugs is rather common? > > Too common to my liking. Didn't you read all those threads where I > constantly say that Emacs doesn't get more stable with the years > because we constantly fix minor issues and by that introduce subtle > regressions elsewhere? Nope. I stay away from such threads most of the time. They take a lot of mental effort. > Which is why we have pretests, where we are supposed to detect at > least the more obvious of those regressions. The question that really > bothers me is how to make more frequent releases without losing that > QA element, because we really need it. So any suggestion to lower the > bar is in my eyes a non-starter. Point taken. In my eyes, it was not lowering the bar, but you indeed have much more experience. -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at . Support Org development at , or support my work at