From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?Sebasti=C3=A1n_Mon=C3=ADa?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use vtable for eww-bookmarks Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2024 00:43:39 -0500 Message-ID: <87cyh8z9tg.fsf@sebasmonia.com> References: <87ldx0vufd.fsf@sebasmonia.com> <8fde5a67-f778-f0c8-bcdd-ece08c95d369@gmail.com> <87h67nm4su.fsf@sebasmonia.com> <28ba395f-5c52-1fc8-a99a-9bae461520d8@gmail.com> <36a57a48-76ab-4254-b3bc-af1fff2d9b98@app.fastmail.com> <87ttb9k04u.fsf@sebasmonia.com> <86wmfkt6ei.fsf@gnu.org> <39071ad9-a369-2e2f-aa1c-779f8103b566@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="18280"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , adam@alphapapa.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Jim Porter Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 31 06:44:26 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1tSV3I-0004aG-Ek for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 31 Dec 2024 06:44:25 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tSV2k-00051D-8p; Tue, 31 Dec 2024 00:43:50 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tSV2h-00050r-LD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Dec 2024 00:43:47 -0500 Original-Received: from fout-b5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([202.12.124.148]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tSV2f-0006LV-4J; Tue, 31 Dec 2024 00:43:47 -0500 Original-Received: from phl-compute-06.internal (phl-compute-06.phl.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailfout.stl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BA9511401AB; Tue, 31 Dec 2024 00:43:40 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from phl-mailfrontend-01 ([10.202.2.162]) by phl-compute-06.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 31 Dec 2024 00:43:40 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sebasmonia.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type :date:date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm3; t=1735623820; x=1735710220; bh=JthOwJUJIGrw/rUo+j8DnKrY5PiCDDQV N2mUq2bPgIU=; b=gxjK8+GGGfAmBd/XlIpQiySaWU0EOi7voxK90jOxxoq5K3YW avJYuRXvl0EBjhLvK5X9WF2pCQ/HO/6iX7+R+aRP4ncs1AVFJibpJmPc1ddnDiVe xqsZ5YjN8gocEkA/J7JbBy8hcdxzImfGYjaLmzvkash5QhB4ga6AOb/qvNpwjo0W MxRhKwApWNmPN5O23wcsYFhB6Z03Io+CfLHjA0uWMvV8n8dHzo3+XG3PhSMax6r+ KPkzcbG7X11j2jvbme+AvOkGfnDNWymLyV30XTGvHQrzaECVZ0fz7CKdLdxWgb8h lijSkCRh7fbhkxdz9KCzPry+J6jtovF0+Zzsug== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t=1735623820; x= 1735710220; bh=JthOwJUJIGrw/rUo+j8DnKrY5PiCDDQVN2mUq2bPgIU=; b=e TT0NHG2wz8ig2b6JbmX5Sr94WBSyhE57uouhKp1Gwtnlk9kwX4RQzt49k1YXEFRS GPL2bHINJn7NUPxr+CIwKn4hVAZaJnPrcfohQbuiJxS7DwJogBSPBAFNJLOMDDgh gH+F6lDlSVKMeINMM7cSARR4Y63H1j9Ai/zbPSXIOdINp10/OvtGM3E0S+Ghw/dd Z9b/W6Yr4Me6SOZH9DRT4vOIdbryKkUpDN8yMEMYAOikx7VZsy68Ci75SgEH8WX4 Bi9s8OAlxcg1dGvb6RZ50d0qPposhgXIb69rKvrVz446XvmcDmLF0YcBvJxZUhGO nIKMqvugDRa001vzamc/A== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefuddruddvjedgkeejucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdggtfgfnhhsuhgsshgtrhhisggvpdfu rfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnh htshculddquddttddmnecujfgurhephffvvefujghffffkfgggtgfgsehtqhertddtreej necuhfhrohhmpefuvggsrghsthhijohnucfoohhnvogruceoshgvsggrshhtihgrnhessh gvsggrshhmohhnihgrrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeekteetkeegvdegheev ledtuefhvefggfekheekfeetveekieehieevtdethfeludenucffohhmrghinhepshgvsg grshhmohhnihgrrdgtohhmnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehm rghilhhfrhhomhepshgvsggrshhtihgrnhesshgvsggrshhmohhnihgrrdgtohhmpdhnsg gprhgtphhtthhopeegpdhmohguvgepshhmthhpohhuthdprhgtphhtthhopegvmhgrtghs qdguvghvvghlsehgnhhurdhorhhgpdhrtghpthhtoheprggurghmsegrlhhphhgrphgrph grrdhnvghtpdhrtghpthhtohepvghlihiisehgnhhurdhorhhgpdhrtghpthhtohepjhhp ohhrthgvrhgsuhhgsh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: iab2c46da:Fastmail Original-Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue, 31 Dec 2024 00:43:39 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <39071ad9-a369-2e2f-aa1c-779f8103b566@gmail.com> (Jim Porter's message of "Mon, 30 Dec 2024 16:07:19 -0800") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=202.12.124.148; envelope-from=sebastian@sebasmonia.com; helo=fout-b5-smtp.messagingengine.com X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:327479 Archived-At: Jim Porter writes: > On 12/28/2024 3:04 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Ping! Can we please make some progress here? > > In the interest of making progress on this, does anyone have any > *objections* to this patch? How about we wait a few days for anyone > with objections to make them known, and if not, we just merge the > current patch? > > Once we do that, we can announce the change in a new thread on this > list just to give people another chance to raise any objections. Hi all, I am open to comments, suggestions, as mentioned in my last reply.=20 I still don't think it is worth it to re-use the bookmark list, but if there's consensus to change, I will do it. Thanks everyone, Seb --=20 Sebasti=C3=A1n Mon=C3=ADa https://site.sebasmonia.com/