all messages for Emacs-related lists mirrored at yhetil.org
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Chong Yidong <cyd@stupidchicken.com>
Subject: "Misunderstanding of the lambda calculus"
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 00:42:16 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87bqxva8uf.fsf@stupidchicken.com> (raw)

This may amuse some of the readers of this mailing list.  While
browsing the Wikipedia entry on lambda calculus, I saw that some wit
had written:

  Lisp uses a variant of lambda notation for defining functions, but
  only its purely functional subset is really equivalent to lambda
  calculus. Strictly speaking, this holds only for modern dialects of
  Lisp, such as Common Lisp and Scheme. More archaic Lisps, such as
  Emacs Lisp, still use dynamic binding, and so are not based on the
  lambda calculus. Rather, they are based on the syntax of the lambda
  calculus, together with a misunderstanding of the notion of binding
  and substitution in the lambda calculus.

             reply	other threads:[~2006-01-29  5:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-01-29  5:42 Chong Yidong [this message]
     [not found] <E1F3FdP-0002xe-OW@monty-python.gnu.org>
2006-01-29 17:51 ` "Misunderstanding of the lambda calculus" Jonathan Yavner
2006-01-29 18:32   ` David Kastrup
2006-01-30 18:46     ` Richard M. Stallman
2006-01-30 19:28       ` David Kastrup
2006-01-31 18:03         ` Richard M. Stallman
2006-01-31 19:47           ` Kevin Rodgers
2006-01-31 20:09           ` Stefan Monnier
2006-02-01 19:38             ` Richard M. Stallman
2006-01-31 21:57           ` David Kastrup
2006-02-01  8:12             ` Alan Mackenzie
2006-02-01  8:52               ` David Kastrup
2006-02-01 10:40                 ` Miles Bader
2006-02-01 15:01                   ` Jonathan Yavner
2006-02-01 19:39             ` Richard M. Stallman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87bqxva8uf.fsf@stupidchicken.com \
    --to=cyd@stupidchicken.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.