From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bastien <bzg@altern.org>
Subject: Re: Archive tag
Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2007 23:37:18 +0000
Message-ID: <87bqacz0b5.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
References: <usl3ozqx2.fsf@uni-konstanz.de> <87lk9gjxn9.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
	<uabpwwmz6.fsf@uni-konstanz.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Io58u-0005PB-2S
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Nov 2007 18:37:32 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Io58r-0005Le-W6
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Nov 2007 18:37:31 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Io58r-0005LR-Ph
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Nov 2007 18:37:29 -0400
Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.189])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@googlemail.com>) id 1Io58r-0000gR-A2
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Nov 2007 18:37:29 -0400
Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id f5so1036305nfh
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Fri, 02 Nov 2007 15:37:27 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <uabpwwmz6.fsf@uni-konstanz.de> (Uwe Jochum's message of "Fri, 02
	Nov 2007 18:55:57 +0100")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

"Uwe Jochum" <uwe.jochum@uni-konstanz.de> writes:

> thanks for pointing to the new property feature, which isn't that new,
> I know. But I hadn't found the information on a fixed property name
> "Archive" in the manual either. Perhaps my fault.

No, the manual should be updated on this.  Thanks for pointing this out.

> I'll stay with the English name "Archive" and see what properties can
> do.

I guess once the set of Org internal properties stabilizes, we might be
somehow able to customize their names.

Best,

-- 
Bastien