From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stephen Berman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs Subject: Re: invisible Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 00:04:58 +0100 Message-ID: <87bq9kpnqd.fsf@escher.local.home> References: <20040225.150142.12214540.kazu@iijlab.net> <200402282128.i1SLSuY15359@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <200402290224.i1T2Oip15705@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <87sl3fdqs3.fsf@escher.local.home> <87zlxc5r2f.fsf@escher.local.home> <474059CD.1060107@gmx.at> <87r6ihi1z7.fsf@escher.local.home> <4746E2CF.4010604@gmx.at> <87k5o8q0y5.fsf@escher.local.home> <4747312D.7020605@gmx.at> <87fxywpuuy.fsf@escher.local.home> <47474B8C.9020806@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1195859161 2292 80.91.229.12 (23 Nov 2007 23:06:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 23:06:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 24 00:06:07 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ivhaa-0003Gc-C5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 24 Nov 2007 00:05:48 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IvhaL-0002dX-U7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 18:05:21 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IvhaI-0002bj-7u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 18:05:18 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IvhaG-0002ZL-Oi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 18:05:17 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IvhaG-0002ZI-Ln for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 18:05:16 -0500 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IvhaG-0000zp-7V for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 18:05:16 -0500 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1IvhaC-0001VS-Nz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 23:05:12 +0000 Original-Received: from i5387d19d.versanet.de ([83.135.209.157]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 23:05:12 +0000 Original-Received: from Stephen.Berman by i5387d19d.versanet.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 23:05:12 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 18 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: i5387d19d.versanet.de User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:84016 gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:20354 Archived-At: On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 22:52:12 +0100 martin rudalics wrote: >> It's the same as before: C-p skips lines 5 and 3 with rear-nonsticky >> nil, does not skip with rear-nonsticky t, and (forward-line -1) does not >> skip regardless of rear-nonstickiness. I tested on GNU Emacs 23.0.50.1 >> (i686-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.12.0) of 2007-11-21. Could the >> differences between what you and I see be related to the EOL difference >> between MS Windows and Unix? Can other users of these systems who are >> following this thread try these tests and report their observations? > > Hmmm... I think I see why you don't see it. With emacs -Q visit the > attached file, evaluate fl-1 and the first progn, move point before > line7 and do M-x fl-1 twice. Undo the changes, evaluate the second > progn and do the same movement again. Can you see the difference now? Yes. So why does (interactive) have this effect? Steve Berman