Re: invisible

[Stephen Berman <Stephen.Berman@gmx.net>]

On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 22:52:12 +0100 martin rudalics <rudalics@gmx.at> wrote:

>> It's the same as before: C-p skips lines 5 and 3 with rear-nonsticky
>> nil, does not skip with rear-nonsticky t, and (forward-line -1) does not
>> skip regardless of rear-nonstickiness.  I tested on GNU Emacs 23.0.50.1
>> (i686-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.12.0) of 2007-11-21.  Could the
>> differences between what you and I see be related to the EOL difference
>> between MS Windows and Unix?  Can other users of these systems who are
>> following this thread try these tests and report their observations?
>
> Hmmm... I think I see why you don't see it.  With emacs -Q visit the
> attached file, evaluate fl-1 and the first progn, move point before
> line7 and do M-x fl-1 twice.  Undo the changes, evaluate the second
> progn and do the same movement again.  Can you see the difference now?

Yes.  So why does (interactive) have this effect?

Steve Berman