From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Bastien Guerry Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: password-cache for smtpmail.el Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 21:53:21 +0000 Message-ID: <87bq6ko75a.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1202939620 6223 80.91.229.12 (13 Feb 2008 21:53:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 21:53:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Justus-bulk@Piater.name To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 13 22:54:03 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JPPYI-0002It-6g for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 22:54:02 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JPPXo-00084M-Kt for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 16:53:32 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JPPXk-00081i-4C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 16:53:28 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JPPXh-00080j-Vv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 16:53:27 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JPPXh-00080g-S6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 16:53:25 -0500 Original-Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.172]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JPPXh-0004Ta-Jt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 16:53:25 -0500 Original-Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id a2so928463ugf.48 for ; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 13:53:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type:sender; bh=iyFHgM0rW+dPov5TzfprXpsQx0LMjkqj2AX9XIG+yfo=; b=hxMkFnFCLZksph9y3BN7f/tdU+jbDBDDMHAFqY/ACAkmV1IXnn0YJ8bKY31yprRH0z3jhb55dP+oSHQTs506yuiVJQ4JXrXHWHdFeyeLPusk0H5npDWNwuPRBENj9G0aGRO+0yY+BI5am48hLlAIEuLu+vh1mBjf6tbYEkKpaNg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type:sender; b=YGUWygaCk09KJa760Xj/Rr8EljPO1UZPbBIcE9TpU+pTY8EsHfA4Hme6JnxeXs02E8mui3nk9EI2wlcmXGLQRV8KUmmWFZS0mXHijcnsmdePGGg7ieYgeH2hTTyB2ZvA/hE4AYjvAaa7YYU1EfCJKW6+2zxrLcsJCdaxQ7ijMSo= Original-Received: by 10.78.179.12 with SMTP id b12mr975436huf.34.1202939604070; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 13:53:24 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from bzg.ath.cx ( [131.227.122.122]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d25sm4027886nfh.33.2008.02.13.13.53.22 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 13 Feb 2008 13:53:22 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by bzg.ath.cx (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 01F79157B18; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 21:53:21 +0000 (GMT) In-Reply-To: (Justus-bulk@piater.name's message of "Wed, 13 Feb 2008 11:04:37 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110007 (No Gnus v0.7) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:88982 Archived-At: Justus-bulk@Piater.name writes: > The current version of smtpmail.el does not remember the password if > .authinfo is used. I removed this condition because it prevents > password caching for people who do not store passwords in .authinfo, > and I do not see any harm caused by removing it. > > Could you test and apply the patch? I have tested this, looks fine. I applied the patch. -- Bastien