From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Cygwin emacs - does it work? Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2008 23:05:08 +0900 Message-ID: <87bq075zhn.fsf@catnip.gol.com> References: <48985B66.3090207@gmail.com> Reply-To: Miles Bader NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1217945160 22528 80.91.229.12 (5 Aug 2008 14:06:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 14:06:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs Devel To: "Lennart Borgman \(gmail\)" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 05 16:06:50 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KQNBD-00017H-4M for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Aug 2008 16:06:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55058 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KQNAH-0006zO-BI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Aug 2008 10:05:29 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KQN9p-0006nJ-F0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Aug 2008 10:05:01 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KQN9m-0006lT-O5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Aug 2008 10:05:00 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=39671 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KQN9m-0006lM-K0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Aug 2008 10:04:58 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp11.dentaku.gol.com ([203.216.5.73]:52563) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KQN9d-0000Xl-LH; Tue, 05 Aug 2008 10:04:51 -0400 Original-Received: from 218.45.67.106.eo.eaccess.ne.jp ([218.45.67.106] helo=catnip.gol.com) by smtp11.dentaku.gol.com with esmtpa (Dentaku) id 1KQN9N-00080k-Ea; Tue, 05 Aug 2008 23:04:33 +0900 Original-Received: by catnip.gol.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7B197DFB3; Tue, 5 Aug 2008 23:05:08 +0900 (JST) System-Type: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu In-Reply-To: <48985B66.3090207@gmail.com> (Lennart Borgman's message of "Tue, 05 Aug 2008 15:53:42 +0200") Original-Lines: 16 X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV GOL (outbound) X-Abuse-Complaints: abuse@gol.com X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:102087 Archived-At: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" writes: > I just out of curiosity installed Cygwin Emacs. Now I am more curious > about why this version of Emacs is there. It certainly _used_ to work just fine, and is of course quite useful for using with a cygwin installation. I've only installed it from the standard cygwin package though... [about 7 months ago] I don't have a windows system now though. -Miles -- My spirit felt washed. With blood. [Eli Shin, on "The Passion of the Christ"]