From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Undo-limit default Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2008 09:53:42 -0500 Message-ID: <87bpvoghop.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> References: <873ah0n4xc.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> <493BC963.3000907@gmx.at> <493BCDB2.1010001@gmx.at> <87vdtwf43c.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1228662291 11663 80.91.229.12 (7 Dec 2008 15:04:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 15:04:51 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Lennart Borgman , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 07 16:05:55 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1L9LCL-0002DJ-8J for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 07 Dec 2008 16:05:54 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60737 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1L9LB9-0002PU-3s for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 07 Dec 2008 10:04:15 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1L9L0w-0005Pg-6F for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Dec 2008 09:53:42 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1L9L0u-0005Ox-12 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Dec 2008 09:53:41 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=56860 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1L9L0t-0005OY-8n for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Dec 2008 09:53:39 -0500 Original-Received: from cyd.mit.edu ([18.115.2.24]:52000) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1L9L0s-0004y5-S0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Dec 2008 09:53:38 -0500 Original-Received: by cyd.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8F38757E1D3; Sun, 7 Dec 2008 09:53:42 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <87vdtwf43c.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> (Chong Yidong's message of "Sun, 07 Dec 2008 09:32:39 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:106651 Archived-At: Chong Yidong writes: >> IMHO putting any font-lock handled property on the undo-list is harmful. > > Could you check whether stripping out the font-lock information has any > bad effects? The following untested patch should implement this > behavior BTW, I don't think such a change should go into Emacs 23.1; it might be worth doing after the release.