Re: undefined reference to ftfont_variation_glyphs

[Sebastian Rose <sebastian_rose@gmx.de>]

Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:
>> @@ -422,11 +429,15 @@
>>      NULL,
>>  #endif	/* not (HAVE_M17N_FLT && HAVE_LIBOTF) */
>>      NULL,			/* check */
>> +#ifdef HAVE_LIBOTF
>> +#ifdef HAVE_M17N_FLT
>>  #ifdef HAVE_OTF_GET_VARIATION_GLYPHS
>>      ftfont_variation_glyphs
>>  #else
>>      NULL
>>  #endif
>> +#endif
>> +#endif
>>    };
>  
> Makes me wonder: how come HAVE_OTF_GET_VARIATION_GLYPHS is defined for
> you if ftfont_variation_glyphs isn't?
>
>
>         Stefan

I don't know anything about the emacs code. I think HAVE_LIBOTF is
defined, since ./configure finds libotf.

If HAVE_OTF_GET_VARIATION_GLYPHS is defined in this case, the culprit
might be HAVE_M17N_FLT.

No matter which one is defined or not, it seems wrong to enclose a
functions declaration, usage, and definition in different sets of
include guards.


Regards,

   Sebastian