From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Romain Francoise Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Need help with ad-do-it, it loops Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 16:51:48 +0200 Organization: orebokech dot com Message-ID: <87bppzelq3.fsf@elegiac.orebokech.com> References: <87iqk9oq03.fsf@elegiac.orebokech.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1242053544 9648 80.91.229.12 (11 May 2009 14:52:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 14:52:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs-Devel devel To: Lennart Borgman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon May 11 16:52:14 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1M3WrU-0007yc-9W for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 May 2009 16:52:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50913 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1M3WrT-0007F0-PS for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 May 2009 10:52:11 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M3WrN-0007Ec-GK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 May 2009 10:52:05 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M3WrH-0007DP-W2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 May 2009 10:52:04 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=40939 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1M3WrH-0007DL-SK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 May 2009 10:51:59 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp2-g21.free.fr ([212.27.42.2]:47237) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1M3WrG-0000Zz-S7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 May 2009 10:51:59 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp2-g21.free.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 653974B01E2; Mon, 11 May 2009 16:51:52 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from elegiac.orebokech.com (home.orebokech.com [82.67.41.165]) by smtp2-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A0224B017A; Mon, 11 May 2009 16:51:50 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: by elegiac.orebokech.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 724593B23B; Mon, 11 May 2009 16:51:48 +0200 (CEST) X-Face: }9mYu,e_@+e!`Z-P5kVXa3\_b:hdJ"B)ww[&=b<2=awG:GOIM (Lennart Borgman's message of "Mon, 11 May 2009 08:38:55 +0200") X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:110823 Archived-At: Lennart Borgman writes: > I have asked Romain for a diff (see below), but I am unsure if > that could be non-zero. ?! As I told you in private mail already, I do a clean checkout every time, there is absolutely no chance that the tree can have local changes right after checkout. But since you don't seem to believe it, here's the output of `cvs diff' in my last snapshot directory: $ pwd /home/romain/Work/Debian/emacs-snapshot/tarballs/emacs-snapshot-20090509 $ cvs diff $ Happy now? Also, note that it doesn't actually tell you anything since the Debian packaging applies a few patches, see: http://git.orebokech.com/?p=debian/emacs-snapshot.git;a=tree;f=patches > Can someone please help us with this? Does "cvs update" ensure > that the diff is zero (as Romain assumes below)? You don't understand. I do a cvs up to make sure that if someone was doing a checkin in the time I was doing the checkout, my local checkout contains everything. That's needed because 1) people commit each file separately in Emacs and 2) I'm not sure if CVS checkouts are atomic by nature (although nowadays, they could be).